In another thread there's a discussion over the use of fairly generic European terms for New World wines. Terms like Claret, Bordeaux, Rhone and Burgundy have very specific meanings.
Now for Bordeaux/Claret the term "Meritage" exists. Granted it has its own baggage, but at least its meaning is clearly understood.
For Burgundy there are only two varietals of any consequence, and few people would object to referring to a New World Pinot or Chardonnay as "burgundian"
But what to do about Rhone? Is it any more reasonable to talk about Californian Rhones than Californian Burgundy or Californian Bordeaux? And if not, what to call them?
Original Post