You're leaving out important context Napa, which proves again that you get your so-called "Facts" from questionable sources. Hillary said Biden should not concede until all the votes are counted and legal challenges decided. Here is the rest of her quote:
""“Joe Biden should not concede under any circumstances, because I think this is going to drag out, and eventually I do believe he will win if we don't give an inch, and if we are as focused and relentless as the other side is,” ""
This is the why bother to debate this person. He is truly an ignoramus.
"Pure mail in voting (Non-absentee) could be a potential disaster."
Why? I guess you'll have you have to take Barr's "logic" for it. There is no history or study that remotely suggests it'll be a problem.
"And regarding Trump not accepting the outcome...so far the only one that has was Hillary in 2016..."
I have no idea what you're talking about; Hillary conceded on election night. The only person who has said he won't accept the results (if he loses) is Trump.
As I said there is no point debating this person. He's a muddled thinker who will, in response to these responses, jump to some other unrelated point. The worst thing is he thinks he's makes good points, "Not troubling to you Old Man?????" (I like the high schooler's use of multiple question marks) when in reality it's never happened. A true dummkopf.
Done responding, sputter away.