bman posted:mangiare posted:Does anyone think both teams should get the ball in sudden death overtime? In a championship game with 2 weeks to rest, should they not play a full quarter?
Agree completely.
Like Euro Football.
have penalty kicks Five each side. However the normal place kicker is ineligible to punt. Lets have some fun
mangiare posted:Does anyone think both teams should get the ball in sudden death overtime? In a championship game with 2 weeks to rest, should they not play a full quarter?
Each team should have at least one shot with the ball. I much rather see it end with the college version of tiebreaker rather than the NFL version.
flwino posted:bman posted:mangiare posted:Does anyone think both teams should get the ball in sudden death overtime? In a championship game with 2 weeks to rest, should they not play a full quarter?
Agree completely.
Like Euro Football.
have penalty kicks Five each side. However the normal place kicker is ineligible to punt. Lets have some fun
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EMfaavF1R3E
make the quarterbacks win the game =)
Tonight, I put my trashcan out for the trash pickup. Hope they'll take it.
PH
napacat posted:flwino posted:Napa couldn't identify "truth" even if it wore a name tag. He for sure dispels all evidence of wrong doing by the dumpster and pals.
Now in Florida the new pal of the dumpster has fired the elections supervisors in Palm Beach and Broward as they did their best to count the votes.
I called you a moron and I need to apologize to morons. You’re dumber than I thought.
mangiare posted:vint posted:Oh my god. We’ve regressed all the way back to the public school playground.
How’s this for an idea? How about posters in this thread debate ideas, ideologies, issues and possibilities using logic, verifiable facts, humor and a dash of humility? Lose the attacks on the other guy’s character, intelligence and anything else personal that serve only to drag discourse into the gutter.
It’s hard. I know. The first reaction is visceral. You want to go after the person, not their viewpoint. Public figures are not exactly settling a good example here. But you can do this. You’re all intelligent, well-spoken, upstanding guys.
Go back to your corners. Take a deep breath. Come out fighting, but keep it clean. No low blows. Okay?
Miss you VinT. We need to share a glass in the near future.
Amen, bro
thistlintom posted:mangiare posted:Does anyone think both teams should get the ball in sudden death overtime? In a championship game with 2 weeks to rest, should they not play a full quarter?
Each team should have at least one shot with the ball. I much rather see it end with the college version of tiebreaker rather than the NFL version.
Absoulutely Mangiare. CFL OT rules: Under the current rules, if the score is tied at the end of a game, each team gets an opportunity to scrimmage from its opponent's 35-yard-line, until it makes a score or loses possession. If the score remains tied, the procedure is repeated at the opposite end of the stadium.
The outcome of the Pats game is a joke, as is the other. Between the bad/missed calls that were game changers in the final minutes of the game and the coin toss for a single team to get the receiving advantage, the result is that 'best two teams' going to the Superbowl is simply a flawed concept at best.
The sudden death OT approach of the NFL is the equivalent of giving one European football, a.k.a. soccer, 5 penalty kicks and if they get any, they win. Beyond stupid.
Sadly, all that will be remembered if Pats win again is how great Brady was, not the missteps that got them to the game. Would be better if the team that wins got there of its own accord (without refs determining the outcome) and in on a level OT playing field.
vincentric posted:thistlintom posted:mangiare posted:Does anyone think both teams should get the ball in sudden death overtime? In a championship game with 2 weeks to rest, should they not play a full quarter?
Each team should have at least one shot with the ball. I much rather see it end with the college version of tiebreaker rather than the NFL version.
Absoulutely Mangiare. CFL OT rules: Under the current rules, if the score is tied at the end of a game, each team gets an opportunity to scrimmage from its opponent's 35-yard-line, until it makes a score or loses possession. If the score remains tied, the procedure is repeated at the opposite end of the stadium.
The outcome of the Pats game is a joke, as is the other. Between the bad/missed calls that were game changers in the final minutes of the game and the coin toss for a single team to get the receiving advantage, the result is that 'best two teams' going to the Superbowl is simply a flawed concept at best.
The sudden death OT approach of the NFL is the equivalent of giving one European football, a.k.a. soccer, 5 penalty kicks and if they get any, they win. Beyond stupid.
Sadly, all that will be remembered if Pats win again is how great Brady was, not the missteps that got them to the game. Would be better if the team that wins got there of its own accord (without refs determining the outcome) and in on a level OT playing field.
New Orleans won the coin toss, got the ball first and lost.
New England got the ball first and won.
50/50 results....kind of like a coin toss.
patespo1 posted:vincentric posted:thistlintom posted:mangiare posted:Does anyone think both teams should get the ball in sudden death overtime? In a championship game with 2 weeks to rest, should they not play a full quarter?
Each team should have at least one shot with the ball. I much rather see it end with the college version of tiebreaker rather than the NFL version.
Absoulutely Mangiare. CFL OT rules: Under the current rules, if the score is tied at the end of a game, each team gets an opportunity to scrimmage from its opponent's 35-yard-line, until it makes a score or loses possession. If the score remains tied, the procedure is repeated at the opposite end of the stadium.
The outcome of the Pats game is a joke, as is the other. Between the bad/missed calls that were game changers in the final minutes of the game and the coin toss for a single team to get the receiving advantage, the result is that 'best two teams' going to the Superbowl is simply a flawed concept at best.
The sudden death OT approach of the NFL is the equivalent of giving one European football, a.k.a. soccer, 5 penalty kicks and if they get any, they win. Beyond stupid.
Sadly, all that will be remembered if Pats win again is how great Brady was, not the missteps that got them to the game. Would be better if the team that wins got there of its own accord (without refs determining the outcome) and in on a level OT playing field.
New Orleans won the coin toss, got the ball first and lost.
New England got the ball first and won.
50/50 results....kind of like a coin toss.
except we all know on an NFL coin, that there is actually a 51/49 bias towards the side the coin that started out facing.
On an actual coin, the odds are even more biased towards the side the coin starting face position because most people dont know how to flip a coin and instead it just wobbles in the air.
add to the fact that on the law of averages those receiving the ball first have a 52% chance of winning the ball game means
1. you always choose to receive the ball
2. you always look to see what face the coin is and you pick the same face.
Drum beat seems louder today.
g-man posted:patespo1 posted:vincentric posted:thistlintom posted:mangiare posted:Does anyone think both teams should get the ball in sudden death overtime? In a championship game with 2 weeks to rest, should they not play a full quarter?
Each team should have at least one shot with the ball. I much rather see it end with the college version of tiebreaker rather than the NFL version.
Absoulutely Mangiare. CFL OT rules: Under the current rules, if the score is tied at the end of a game, each team gets an opportunity to scrimmage from its opponent's 35-yard-line, until it makes a score or loses possession. If the score remains tied, the procedure is repeated at the opposite end of the stadium.
The outcome of the Pats game is a joke, as is the other. Between the bad/missed calls that were game changers in the final minutes of the game and the coin toss for a single team to get the receiving advantage, the result is that 'best two teams' going to the Superbowl is simply a flawed concept at best.
The sudden death OT approach of the NFL is the equivalent of giving one European football, a.k.a. soccer, 5 penalty kicks and if they get any, they win. Beyond stupid.
Sadly, all that will be remembered if Pats win again is how great Brady was, not the missteps that got them to the game. Would be better if the team that wins got there of its own accord (without refs determining the outcome) and in on a level OT playing field.
New Orleans won the coin toss, got the ball first and lost.
New England got the ball first and won.
50/50 results....kind of like a coin toss.
except we all know on an NFL coin, that there is actually a 51/49 bias towards the side the coin that started out facing.
On an actual coin, the odds are even more biased towards the side the coin starting face position because most people dont know how to flip a coin and instead it just wobbles in the air.
add to the fact that on the law of averages those receiving the ball first have a 52% chance of winning the ball game means
1. you always choose to receive the ball
2. you always look to see what face the coin is and you pick the same face.
I like the NFL rules as they stand now. If you lose the coin toss, you have a chance to get the ball. All you have to do is stop the offence from scoring a TD. If you can't, you don't have anything to complain about beside your poor defense. You want a chance at the ball, stop the other team. Simple.
winetarelli posted:Drum beat seems louder today.
... senior Trump campaign officials. Who had the authority to direct senior campaign officials actions within the campaign? 😎
So glad I’m not flying today!
wineart 2 posted:winetarelli posted:Drum beat seems louder today.
... senior Trump campaign officials. Who had the authority to direct senior campaign officials actions within the campaign? 😎
One down
2 to go Jared and Don Jr.
csm posted:g-man posted:patespo1 posted:vincentric posted:thistlintom posted:mangiare posted:Does anyone think both teams should get the ball in sudden death overtime? In a championship game with 2 weeks to rest, should they not play a full quarter?
Each team should have at least one shot with the ball. I much rather see it end with the college version of tiebreaker rather than the NFL version.
Absoulutely Mangiare. CFL OT rules: Under the current rules, if the score is tied at the end of a game, each team gets an opportunity to scrimmage from its opponent's 35-yard-line, until it makes a score or loses possession. If the score remains tied, the procedure is repeated at the opposite end of the stadium.
The outcome of the Pats game is a joke, as is the other. Between the bad/missed calls that were game changers in the final minutes of the game and the coin toss for a single team to get the receiving advantage, the result is that 'best two teams' going to the Superbowl is simply a flawed concept at best.
The sudden death OT approach of the NFL is the equivalent of giving one European football, a.k.a. soccer, 5 penalty kicks and if they get any, they win. Beyond stupid.
Sadly, all that will be remembered if Pats win again is how great Brady was, not the missteps that got them to the game. Would be better if the team that wins got there of its own accord (without refs determining the outcome) and in on a level OT playing field.
New Orleans won the coin toss, got the ball first and lost.
New England got the ball first and won.
50/50 results....kind of like a coin toss.
except we all know on an NFL coin, that there is actually a 51/49 bias towards the side the coin that started out facing.
On an actual coin, the odds are even more biased towards the side the coin starting face position because most people dont know how to flip a coin and instead it just wobbles in the air.
add to the fact that on the law of averages those receiving the ball first have a 52% chance of winning the ball game means
1. you always choose to receive the ball
2. you always look to see what face the coin is and you pick the same face.
I like the NFL rules as they stand now. If you lose the coin toss, you have a chance to get the ball. All you have to do is stop the offence from scoring a TD. If you can't, you don't have anything to complain about beside your poor defense. You want a chance at the ball, stop the other team. Simple.
It would be interesting to see the stats on what percentage of 'Receiving teams' in OT won. My guess (and it's an educated guess only) is that there is an advantage to winning the coin toss.
vincentric posted:csm posted:g-man posted:patespo1 posted:vincentric posted:thistlintom posted:mangiare posted:Does anyone think both teams should get the ball in sudden death overtime? In a championship game with 2 weeks to rest, should they not play a full quarter?
Each team should have at least one shot with the ball. I much rather see it end with the college version of tiebreaker rather than the NFL version.
Absoulutely Mangiare. CFL OT rules: Under the current rules, if the score is tied at the end of a game, each team gets an opportunity to scrimmage from its opponent's 35-yard-line, until it makes a score or loses possession. If the score remains tied, the procedure is repeated at the opposite end of the stadium.
The outcome of the Pats game is a joke, as is the other. Between the bad/missed calls that were game changers in the final minutes of the game and the coin toss for a single team to get the receiving advantage, the result is that 'best two teams' going to the Superbowl is simply a flawed concept at best.
The sudden death OT approach of the NFL is the equivalent of giving one European football, a.k.a. soccer, 5 penalty kicks and if they get any, they win. Beyond stupid.
Sadly, all that will be remembered if Pats win again is how great Brady was, not the missteps that got them to the game. Would be better if the team that wins got there of its own accord (without refs determining the outcome) and in on a level OT playing field.
New Orleans won the coin toss, got the ball first and lost.
New England got the ball first and won.
50/50 results....kind of like a coin toss.
except we all know on an NFL coin, that there is actually a 51/49 bias towards the side the coin that started out facing.
On an actual coin, the odds are even more biased towards the side the coin starting face position because most people dont know how to flip a coin and instead it just wobbles in the air.
add to the fact that on the law of averages those receiving the ball first have a 52% chance of winning the ball game means
1. you always choose to receive the ball
2. you always look to see what face the coin is and you pick the same face.
I like the NFL rules as they stand now. If you lose the coin toss, you have a chance to get the ball. All you have to do is stop the offence from scoring a TD. If you can't, you don't have anything to complain about beside your poor defense. You want a chance at the ball, stop the other team. Simple.
It would be interesting to see the stats on what percentage of 'Receiving teams' in OT won. My guess (and it's an educated guess only) is that there is an advantage to winning the coin toss.
I gave it, it's 52% chance of winning the game if you win the coin toss
How does it feel to get kicked in the balls by Pelosi?
Ask Trump?
in the NFL Believe that each team should be a receiver. Once the receiver has scored, or failed to, a new kick off is required. Continue until a score is accomplished. If both score, repeat the process.
vincentric posted:It would be interesting to see the stats on what percentage of 'Receiving teams' in OT won. My guess (and it's an educated guess only) is that there is an advantage to winning the coin toss.
I didn't say there wasn't an advantage. There clearly is, otherwise some people would pick going on defence if they win the toss. That is 100% of the time choice to go on offence.
I just don't like people portraying it as both teams not getting a "chance" to have the ball. They do. Stop the other team on defense and you get the ball and the advantage flips to you. It's even better that you are able to win with a FG, not a TD. The CFL/College rules are a little too gimmicky for me, even if they are exciting.
The escort at the table next to me REALLY knows her wine and just had a five minute conversation with the somm while her "Date" for the night looked on flabbergasted and totally lost. It was really hard not to laugh or join the conversation.
