In last night's Democratic "debate" candidate Andrew Yang did not wear a tie. This is transformational.  Yes, it is true that the mullahs in Iran and the leaders of India don't wear ties, but here, the solid red tie and the blue one are considered political necessities.

Did you notice that he did not have a tie on?  Do you care?

 

 

 

Original Post

Didn’t notice. A piece of shit in a full suit is still a piece of shit, as we’re seeing.

Offering specifics as to how grandiose plans get achieved and not continually interrupting or talking over others would be transformational. Biden was the only one getting major action who tried to respect the idea of allotted time. Unfortunately for him, that was among his high points, IMHO.

flwino posted:
patespo1 posted:

He had so little screen time he barely registered.  But no, don't care one bit.  I'll take a person with no tie over what's in the White House right now, any day.

or wearing a dress or pant suits

Pant suit.  Hill should be in prison stripes! Or full Orange!  She should be wearing the color of Donald!!! 

napacat posted:
flwino posted:
patespo1 posted:

He had so little screen time he barely registered.  But no, don't care one bit.  I'll take a person with no tie over what's in the White House right now, any day.

or wearing a dress or pant suits

Pant suit.  Hill should be in prison stripes! Or full Orange!  She should be wearing the color of Donald!!! 

who is Hill?

here in Flori-duh.  What is a suit?  What is a tie?

Get by mostly with a blazer, and collared shirt at most all functions.  Like wish our cubs are no jeans, slacks and a collared shirt for most all events except for New Years [Could care less about that night] where 'formal' is requested.

Add Reply

Likes (0)
×
×
×
×