Hunger Games: Catching Fire Plot holes the size of Wisconsin, if not the entire Great Lakes region. Nevertheless it is a very enjoyable ride with real actors, real nuance and character development, great production values, and real intrigue. 2 hours, 25 minutes zips by. Very much enjoyed despite its obvious shortcomings. I think this Jennifer Lawrence girl might be a decent actress.

B/B+
RED 2 Mindless, incomprehensible plot. Fun despite itself. C+
Get Shorty For the 6th or 7th time. Wonderful film. Probably Sonnenfeld's best. Travolta looks younger in it than I remember. B+ / A-
Ok... and... so a few pages back tanglenet name-checked this film as if, "oh yeah, everyone has seen that..." and it was playing for free On Demand, so I figured, "how bad could it be? I mean it stars Michael Cain!" So...
Blame it on Rio Wow. WOW.
WOW. OHMYGOD! Pervy doesn't even... just... ew. EWW. Every scene, every word is SO ew. I mean the 17 year old (age at the time of hiring, dunno if she was 17 or 18 while filming; the character is definitely supposed to be 17 or 18, though -- probably 17) is really
really hot. So, there is that. But wow. I mean HOLY CRAP. PERRRRVVYYYYY! Wow. Once I realized what I was in for I was able to sit back and enjoy it as a "so bad, so MIND BOGGLINGLY offensive, misogynistic, creepy and PERVY, it is incredibly funny, but for the wrong reasons" thing. But WOWOWOWOWOWOW. This might be the single dirtiest-old-man-thought-process mainstream movie I have ever seen. Ever.
It was directed by the guy who directed Singin' in the Rain!!!! Wow. Pervy. Q- (But still worth checking out as an oddity if you have the right sense of humor.)