Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Sancho - the sweetness was intense but did you like the wine?

I agree with the other posters in that the wine is more about sweetness than fruit, but it's created for the US palate, or whatever they think constitutes the US palate, and they're selling the hell out of that wine.

Fruit bomb is frequently associated with other wines from Australia tho - especially those from the Barossa Valley, as well as lots of zinfandels from California, among other wines. Some wineries for example, get extremely ripe fruit in the Barossa. To avoid having a rather flat wine, they acidify it. If done well, you can't really tell but if done less well, you get the combination of fruit intensity with an acidic bite, much like those candies mentioned.

Some people love fruit bombs, others don't, others are willing to enjoy many different types of wines.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by GregT:
Sancho - the sweetness was intense but did you like the wine?

.[/QUOTE

This particular sweetness...No. I've had a Zinfandel though, recently, that was sweet but there were some nuances in it (that I find challenging to describe) that I truly enjoyed. I need a wine class man. A wine class where I can taste side by side with others and an instructor to guide me through some of the tasting experience.
Yellowtail lists nutrition facts on their website, from which you can calculate the approximate residual sugar - 8 grams is about right.

I've never had the Yellow Tail Shiraz, but I've had the Reserve, and it wasn't bad - I'd guess aorund 1g residual sugar (I start to taste RS between 1 and 1.5).

Sometimes RS is not the whole story. Mollydooker has around 3g/L, but their wines taste incredibly sweet to me because of the high glycerine content.

Remember everyone's palate is different - lots of my friends didn't think the '06 Mollydooker Boxer was sweet at all.

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×