@Rothko posted:The superspreader event at the White House, the most tested and protected place in the world, shows just how insidious this virus can be. If the White House can become a hot spot or Covid cluster, what chances do our schools have?
Well, most schools aren't full of brainwashed trumpanzees. So there's that!
I think you are correct. Schools could actually implement safety protocols better than the White House, if they wanted to and had the resources. Testing, tracing, masks, PPE, etc.
@Rothko posted:I think you are correct. Schools could actually implement safety protocols better than the White House, if they wanted to and had the resources. Testing, tracing, masks, PPE, etc.
My boys school does Temp checks at the door, masks all day long, smaller class size with desks socially distant. Sanitation stations everywhere. For my son in Junior High they stay with their 'group' for the day. So yes, I feel like the school is safer than the WH
"PS: This will be the first year my family and I can't go skiing in the Alps because of the pandemic. Normally it's because we can't afford it."--email from Penguin Magic
Virtual debate. Yeah! Or better yet, none.
"I don't think I'm contagious at all."
@flwino posted:Virtual debate. Yeah! Or better yet, none.
Afraid? Cowards. Not a single valid reason they should not debate ( if Trump tests negative).
@napacat posted:Afraid? Cowards. Not a single valid reason they should not debate ( if Trump tests negative).
How would we know since the WH refuses to say when he was tested or release the results of his tests. No doubt because they show he is positive and infectious.
As for cowards, it's Trump who is refusing to debate, not Biden! And it's the Debate Commission who made the decision to go with a virtual debate, not Biden. And they did so to follow the WH's own directives on the virus.
Try to keep up, Napa!
He can't, he literally pulled that statement off of what breibart was publishing.
so again, not an original thought coming from the copy paster. pretty sad being such a sheep
@patespo1 posted:My boys school does Temp checks at the door, masks all day long, smaller class size with desks socially distant. Sanitation stations everywhere. For my son in Junior High they stay with their 'group' for the day. So yes, I feel like the school is safer than the WH
Yea, my schools doing the same.
Each desk also has individual cubby shields, and the kids stay together, with janitorial services doing a rotational cleaning when the grades have a staggered lunch break.
Two kids in the older grade came in with coughs and complaining of headaches, they were sent home immediately. Turns out both kids tested positive, now that entire class is on 2 weeks quarantine.
I cannot believe the images of this Trump rally in Florida. By coincidence I just got finished re-watching Idiocracy.
@g-man posted:He can't, he literally pulled that statement off of what breibart was publishing.
so again, not an original thought coming from the copy paster. pretty sad being such a sheep
B-man and G-man are living in alternate worlds from me. I’ve never read Breitbart’s website. Trump is C-19 free and testing negative...why could they not debate on Thursday. Simply trying to hide that fool Biden who thinks he is running for senate. I cannot believe how spoonfed some of you are and think this is legit. How is it there is not one negative story on Biden or Harris on CNN, MSNBC, CBS, NBC Or ABC? Defies logic...unless they are in the tank.
@napacat posted:B-man and G-man are living in alternate worlds from me. I’ve never read Breitbart’s website. Trump is C-19 free and testing negative...why could they not debate on Thursday. Simply trying to hide that fool Biden who thinks he is running for senate. I cannot believe how spoonfed some of you are and think this is legit. How is it there is not one negative story on Biden or Harris on CNN, MSNBC, CBS, NBC Or ABC? Defies logic...unless they are in the tank.
Two things:
-CNN at least has run a number of stories unfavourable to Biden, most recently his refusal to clarify his view on stacking the Supreme Court, ditto the other major networks. BTW, did you decide CBS, NBC and ABC are not legit before they started reporting on Trump's lies, nonsense, contradictions, etc. or only when they did their jobs by doing so?
-how about you spell my moniker correctly, and g-man's too, while you're at it? Especially since the latter is in the message to which you are responding?
One story on stacking and now the Dems try to change the definition of what stacking is! Opposed to multiple negative stories on Trump daily. Nice try...not working. You really sound quite foolish with a moronic attempt like that.
@napacat posted:One story on stacking and now the Dems try to change the definition of what stacking is! Opposed to multiple negative stories on Trump daily. Nice try...not working. You really sound quite foolish with a moronic attempt like that.
There wouldn't be multiple negative stories on Trump daily if he didn't say and do so many stupid things daily!
@napacat posted:B-man and G-man are living in alternate worlds from me. I’ve never read Breitbart’s website. Trump is C-19 free and testing negative...why could they not debate on Thursday. Simply trying to hide that fool Biden who thinks he is running for senate. I cannot believe how spoonfed some of you are and think this is legit. How is it there is not one negative story on Biden or Harris on CNN, MSNBC, CBS, NBC Or ABC? Defies logic...unless they are in the tank.
your statements are simply repostings of what was on breibart. You seem to both lack the knowledge or the ability to find appropriate sources of information. All of the websites you read are simply republishing of the same single article source.
Every one of your talking points has no originality, and unless painfully naive and simple, clearly are the voice of someone else.
So keep on bleating, I'm sure b-man sleeps just as well as I do being successful members of society.
A second vaccine trial goes on hold as the Johnson & Johnson Phase III trial reports a patient with an unexplained illness.
Moderna and Pfizer still conducting their Phase III trials, but with J&J on hold and Astrazenaca still on hold, it's not looking too great for an early authorization of a vaccine.
@napacat posted:One story on stacking and now the Dems try to change the definition of what stacking is! Opposed to multiple negative stories on Trump daily. Nice try...not working. You really sound quite foolish with a moronic attempt like that.
This shill must be watching and editing dumpsters other great channel OANN.
@napacat posted:B-man and G-man are living in alternate worlds from me. I’ve never read Breitbart’s website. Trump is C-19 free and testing negative...why could they not debate on Thursday. Simply trying to hide that fool Biden who thinks he is running for senate. I cannot believe how spoonfed some of you are and think this is legit. How is it there is not one negative story on Biden or Harris on CNN, MSNBC, CBS, NBC Or ABC? Defies logic...unless they are in the tank.
And there have been only two stories around the domestic terrorists looking to kidnap and potentially assassinate the Governor of Michigan on Fox News. And those two stories you have to do a search for because they did not show up on any of the pages. Of course they called them Militia and contemplated that they were actually just going to citizen arrest a criminal Governor when in fact they are White Supremist domestic Terrorists...
Hello everyone, I started trading Forex not so long ago, about half a year to be exact. One of the first problems I faced was finding a good broker. As it turned out, today there are a huge number of brokers, but it is very difficult to determine a reliable one. Visit this page to find out about the best brokers to trade.
"The former New York City mayor [Rudy Giuliani] attending a Columbus Day gathering of Italian Americans for Trump and speaking without wearing a mask when he made the egregious comment.
"'People don’t die of this disease anymore,' he said to the nodding of heads and verbal agreement in the audience. 'Young people don’t die at all. Middle-aged people die very little. And even elderly people have a 1% chance of dying.'"
Trump is so desperate he's willing to risk the lives of thousands of his cult members by holding daily "we love you daddy" rallies. Masks and social distancing of course are not a requirement because he's too smart to believe in them. "I really get this stuff."
He may not get the coronavirus stuff but he gets that he has to go to Iowa a state that he won four years ago by 10%.
Tick, tick, boom.
Got to give those rural farmers in Iowa some credit.
My favorite are the morons you see there who are the few who are wearing masks at today's rally. Since masks are meant to protect others and not yourself you've got to be some kind of stupid to be staying there taking the virus seriously while surrounded by thousands who don't.
What is really interesting is to go to the beginning of this thread and read the posts. It's like a history lesson. The first post was by Rothko on 2/26/20. Here we are around 7 1/2 months later. Amazing read.
I started reading the thread again from the beginning. It is fascinating to see the progression, especially in the beginning. Like a movie script from a disaster film.
It was actually very enlightening to see how people reacted, both the folks who thought that the virus might be serious, and others on here who downplayed it.
At least in the beginning, I had this completely unrealistic hope that the whole thing might be over by May or June and we'd be able to go back to our normal lives. Naïve, I will admit. But my prediction that Florida was going to become a major hot spot in the summer was dead-on accurate.
@Rothko posted:I started reading the thread again from the beginning. It is fascinating to see the progression, especially in the beginning. Like a movie script from a disaster film.
It was actually very enlightening to see how people reacted, both the folks who thought that the virus might be serious, and others on here who downplayed it.
At least in the beginning, I had this completely unrealistic hope that the whole thing might be over by May or June and we'd be able to go back to our normal lives. Naïve, I will admit. But my prediction that Florida was going to become a major hot spot in the summer was dead-on accurate.
My wife and I love trash reality tv after putting our kids to bed. Some of the new seasons are just coming out now, and to look back at the world as they were filmed with Covid just breaking, and seeing peoples' reactions have been surreal.
I wonder if I should be worried that the two guys with cubicles closest to mine are out with fever today...
Folks [fools] here state that there is evidence that masks do not work. When asked where they get the information, all they say is "the evidence is there to see." Like where? Again a blank starr.
There's a new theory from the Jerusalem Post talking about how 70% of new cases were from mask wearers and is now spreading amongst the same old "news" outlets.
Which is clearly a misrepresentation of the data acutally being reported
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volum.../pdfs/mm6936a5-H.pdf
consindering the "70%" of masks wearers apparently all caught their covid cases in high risk areas and also compared to the control group, they are not as compliant. ie selective mask wearers.
@flwino posted:Folks [fools] here state that there is evidence that masks do not work. When asked where they get the information, all they say is "the evidence is there to see." Like where? Again a blank starr.
God you are a blithering moron. Do you only watch MSNBC? The CDC reported the other day that 70.6% of positive C-19 patients reported that they "always" wear a mask. An additional 14.4% reported they often wear a mask (that's 85%...didn't want you to tax yourself doing math).
Only 3.9% of those infected said they never wear a face covering. Follow the science tater.
@g-man posted:There's a new theory from the Jerusalem Post talking about how 70% of new cases were from mask wearers and is now spreading amongst the same old "news" outlets.
Which is clearly a misrepresentation of the data acutally being reported
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volum.../pdfs/mm6936a5-H.pdf
consindering the "70%" of masks wearers apparently all caught their covid cases in high risk areas and also compared to the control group, they are not as compliant. ie selective mask wearers.
Nice post...report was form the CDC....all you do is copy and paste. SAD.
@napacat posted:God you are a blithering moron. Do you only watch MSNBC? The CDC reported the other day that 70.6% of positive C-19 patients reported that they "always" wear a mask. An additional 14.4% reported they often wear a mask (that's 85%...didn't want you to tax yourself doing math).
Only 3.9% of those infected said they never wear a face covering. Follow the science tater.
Source please? I don't find any corroborating information on this. Thanks.
PH
@purplehaze posted:Source please? I don't find any corroborating information on this. Thanks.
PH
Found it. Surprise surprise, Napa omitted some important details. Probably because Fox or Breitbart or Q or wherever he gets his "facts" did so too.
did you not even see my post napa?
I literally posted the actual CDC study, and in bold Errata posted.
now I know for sure napa doesn't acutally read any of the sources that are posted. He just waits to be spoon fed by someone else on tv.
Let's start simple napasheep. Reading is fundamental
@bman posted:And he ignored the debunking of his out of context analysis that I posted above.
I mean it's common sense
the Study explicitly pointed out what happens when individuals enter locations in close contact with those infected.
They list sites like being inside bars/restaurants in close proximity to infected people. Unless you have special powers, i'd like to know how folks can eat with a mask on, so in those instances they clearly got it when they weren't wearing a mask.
Or is the ability to understand studies and deduct from their conclusions too difficult for some people?
@g-man posted:did you not even see my post napa?
I literally posted the actual CDC study, and in bold Errata posted.
Give him a break. As I recently stated he is truly the dumbest person on the forum.
