Question...how does this farce move forward when:
The only people that claim wrongdoing on the call have never met President Trump and were not privy to the call?
And the participants on the call (including the Ukrainian President) say there was nothing inappropriate?
just answer that...don’t bring any other nonsense into your reply.
Easy. And it's not a farce, if you've followed any news source other than Fox or Breitbart. I again recommend that you check out the BBC, The Economist magazine or the CBC rather than any American news source.
No need to be present for a crime to determine that a crime was committed. Police are rarely eyewitnesses to murders but the presence of a dead body riddled with bullet holes is usually pretty good evidence that a crime was committed. Your turn. Explain why it matters whether or not the people who claim wrongdoing would need to have met Trump?
As for the participants saying there was nothing inappropriate, of course the Ukrainian President would say there was nothing inappropriate. Trump would turn against him if he said anything else. He already cut off essential military aid in an attempt to force an investigation into imaginary Biden corruption. Obviously he would not hesitate to punish the Ukrainians if they said anything he didn't like. Note as well that Trump has yet to invite the Ukrainian President for an official visit to Washington.