napacat posted:bman posted:napacat posted:. Let's get to the bottom of this nonsense.......that led to 34 indictments, convictions and/or guilty pleas, spelled out exactly how Russia interfered in the 2016 election to ensure their poodle Trump won, and with any luck will lead to the poodle's indictment for obstruction when he's defeated in 2020, as per the consensus that he'd have been charged now if not the President.
Wow...what drivel. None of the indictments were related to the Trump campaign colluding with Russia. Manafort’s crime was from years prior. The rest...process crimes and BS.
You can’t obstruct justice for a “crime” your not guilty of or did not exist. How long are most of you going to believe this charade? Looking forward to excitement ahead!
I'm pretty sure that one can obstruct justice without being accused of a crime. Maybe Irwin or another learned legal mind can clarify? Several hundred former prosecutors - both Democrats and Republicans - seem to think so!
And Papadopoulos, Stone and 12 Russians were indicted or charged by Mueller for reasons directly related to the Trump campaign.
Maybe you wanna check sources beyond Hannity and Ingraham?