quote:Originally posted by Seaquam:quote:Originally posted by fusionstorm:quote:Originally posted by Seaquam:
So from friends overhearing strangers talking at parties you are able to publicly proclaim that "there's far too many people in Hollywood who have said they cavorted on the "casting couch" with her."
You seem to find it difficult sometimes to stop yourself from maligning other people based on what your "friends" say, don't you?
And you have proof to the contrary? You were there for every one of these events where these convos supposedly took place, and nothing like that occurred? You know with absolute certainty that I'm either making stuff up out of thin air, or the sources of this "info" are also BS'ing?
No, I have no proof to the contrary. No, I was not there for any of the events. But YOU have no proof either. YOU were not there either. That doesn't stop you from posting hurtful things, because your "friends" said something that absolutely must be unquestionably factual. Take a few minutes to look up "hearsay" in a dictionary (to help you, you can find it RIGHT HERE) . Try to add it to your vocabulary.
Just b/c you can't fathom something, and you choose to overlay your limited to non-existent knowledge about the subject, doesn't make other people automatically wrong. Maybe if you did a little digging with any friends you might have in the Hollywood industry, you'd come away surprised at what goes on there. Certainly if you had done a little digging with forumites on a previous topic, your unshakeable faith in someone here would've been altered to a fair degree.
But hey.....ignorance continues to be bliss, right?
I am uncertain whether you are being intentionally obtuse, or you really are just not smart. I "fathom" what you write. It doesn't matter whether you are right or wrong. I don't object to you being wrong or right. What I object to is your rumour-mongering (I'm pretty sure you'll have to look this one up too, so you can FIND IT HERE). What you're doing is just plain wrong.
One of your parents should have taught this to you years ago. I'm actually embarrassed that I have to do this for you now. In any event, I'm done.
Here's where your obtuseness has been shown and broadcast repeatedly to the rest of this forum. You've clearly made the assumption that these "friends" of mine are people that, if not of ill repute, should definitely be considered "suspicious" and hardly unimpeachable sources. Yet you have demonstrated that you have NO clue who these friends of mine might be. On this particular subject, you don't know who they are, what level they are at in the Hollywood hierarchy, who they know and who they would conduct business with. You've obviously made an assumption that they're at some lackey level or below......"this fusionstorm guy wouldn't know anyone above the level of someone slinging drinks and hors d'oeuvres at one of these events, or the valets". Assume what you want.....it only makes you look that much more foolish to dismiss anything I type.
As for your prior obtuseness on a previous subject, I'm guessing that you still haven't figured out who my undoubtedly "shady" or even "made up" forumite sources were, huh? Quite unbelievable you could knowingly still be in the dark after all this time, considering how most anyone who wasn't already friends with these forumites and deigned to do a couple of minutes of investigating was able to figure it out. How do I know this? From the many folks who contacted me directly or through the sources to affirm their own less than stellar interactions at offlines.
But I am no doubt talking out of turn, as you're all knowing in every way imaginable, thus rendering your opinion combined with distinct lack of knowledge about the subject at hand to be nothing short of subject matter expert extraordinaire. We all bow to you.......