And he ignored the debunking of his out of context analysis that I posted above.
I mean it's common sense
the Study explicitly pointed out what happens when individuals enter locations in close contact with those infected.
They list sites like being inside bars/restaurants in close proximity to infected people. Unless you have special powers, i'd like to know how folks can eat with a mask on, so in those instances they clearly got it when they weren't wearing a mask.
Or is the ability to understand studies and deduct from their conclusions too difficult for some people?