Go 
|
New 
|
Find 
|
Notify 
|
|
Reply 
|
|
Admin 
|
New PM! 
|
Member
|
|
| |
| Posts: 5489 | Location: San Jose | Registered: May 24, 2002 |    |
|
Member
|
|
| |
| Posts: 5489 | Location: San Jose | Registered: May 24, 2002 |    |
|
Member
|
ok, I'll stop being a smart ass. I looked for the thread but it's not around any more, it's a couple years old and this was well discussed. The 70% is a myth. Below 30 is bad, corks can dry out. Above 65-70% your labels will turn to mush. So anything over 30% is fine, up to 70% if you care about your labels. It was well discussed, lots of links and documents. --------------- Santa Cruz Mountains Vintage Chart
|
| |
| Posts: 5489 | Location: San Jose | Registered: May 24, 2002 |    |
|
Member
|
Apples and oranges. The evaporation that causes low shoulder fill is the result of osmosis through the cork. The seal that is created by the expanded wet cork fills the gaps between the cork and the bottle. This is much more important. But because cork is porous, over time, it is possible for wine veeeerrrrry slowly to escape throught he cork. Higher humidity seeks out lower humidity to create equalibrium. But the humidity inside the bottle is so much greater, and the cork is only slightly porous that equilibrium cannot be achieved. I know what you are thinking though. "If wine can get out, doesn't that mean that air is getting in?" No. The force of humidity escaping is much more powerful than the reverse (dry air entering the humid environment). If this were not true, then all bottles with low ullage would be oxidized. If you dip a sponge into a bucket of water such that only the tip is in the water, eventually the water will climb up the sponge and the sponge will be fully wet. This doesn't mean that outside air is simultaneously pushing its way down the sponge into the bucket. The force of the climbing water overcomes the force of the penetrating air. So low shoulder fill does indicate evaporation. But outside humidity had nothing to do with it. I'll bet you've seen low shoulder fills that have been stored in damp caves/cellars for years. The extra humidity provided by that "perfect" storage condition did nothing to retard the process. Here's Matt Kramer's take on it: Kramer Article
|
| |
| Posts: 1637 | Location: CONNECTICUT | Registered: Oct 19, 2001 |    |
|
Member
|
aav28, thanks for the topic. my cellar hovers at 70% but would be lower if i didnt have humidification. i've noticed this spring that the walls are showing some signs of mold. the cellar is 3 years old and this is the first i've noticed it. given the responses to your post, i'm likely to dial back the humidity a bit. thanks all.
|
| |
|
 | Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
© Wine Spectator Online 2006
|