Wine Spectator Online    Wine Spectator Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Travel and Entertainment    Michael Broadbent Wins!
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 
Member
Posted
As a fan of Michael Broadbent since I cut my teeth in wine, I was very pleased to read he indeed was cleared of any wrongdoing in his lawsuit against Random House.

The book The Billionaire's Vinegar had zero foundation in putting Broadbent in such a position in my opinion.
 
Posts: 13470 | Location: Dallas TX. | Registered: Feb 21, 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
Its a U.K. settlement and apparently does not affect the book in the U.S.

U.K. is also are known for plantiff friendly libel laws, so in some respects I think Random House chose which country was more important to market the book to. They can't in the U.K. but they can in the U.S....with many, many more people.


Frankly, the whole ordeal seem fishy to me. How nobody gave credence to those bottles being fake before they went the auction amazes me. Kids in a candy store. MB isn't solely to blame though...obviously.
 
Posts: 2136 | Location: Tampa, FL | Registered: Jan 27, 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
I respect the man as well, however I'm not sure if this could be labeled an actual 'victory' for MB.
In any case I'm certain he's happy to have this behind him.
 
Posts: 7150 | Location: Montreal, QC | Registered: Feb 17, 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
w+a

I think you may have tasted a fake bottle recently, but that thread was curiously deleted by the "thread police"! Eek which makes it all the more a question of truth vs fakery. And these were old bottles, just think how much could be made with counterfeit First Growths in today's marketplace! Cost for bottles, labels, and cork, filled with any left bank cru bourgeois could result in a clear profit of about $600 per bottle. Be careful!
 
Posts: 6938 | Location: Germantown, Tennessee | Registered: Oct 25, 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
Wine + Art-

I think you are misreading the settlement agreement.

Neil
 
Posts: 543 | Location: Forest Hills, NY | Registered: Aug 15, 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
Did not read it - any lawsuit in England over libel should be viewed highly suspiciously in my view. I read the book and his judgment appeared to have been exceedingly compromised if half of it is true.
 
Posts: 2689 | Location: South Florida | Registered: Dec 30, 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Neil K.:
Wine + Art-

I think you are misreading the settlement agreement.

Neil


Random House apologized, accepted all allegations were untrue, and paid Broadbent money.

What have I misread?
 
Posts: 13470 | Location: Dallas TX. | Registered: Feb 21, 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by latour67:
w+a

I think you may have tasted a fake bottle recently, but that thread was curiously deleted by the "thread police"! Eek which makes it all the more a question of truth vs fakery. And these were old bottles, just think how much could be made with counterfeit First Growths in today's marketplace! Cost for bottles, labels, and cork, filled with any left bank cru bourgeois could result in a clear profit of about $600 per bottle. Be careful!


What does that have to do with Broadbent?
 
Posts: 13470 | Location: Dallas TX. | Registered: Feb 21, 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
I haven't followed this at all, but I have great admiration for Michael Broadbent. He was my guide when I began collecting and learning about wine.


Just one more sip.
 
Posts: 24979 | Location: NY | Registered: Oct 18, 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by wine+art:
quote:
Originally posted by latour67:
w+a

I think you may have tasted a fake bottle recently, but that thread was curiously deleted by the "thread police"! Eek which makes it all the more a question of truth vs fakery. And these were old bottles, just think how much could be made with counterfeit First Growths in today's marketplace! Cost for bottles, labels, and cork, filled with any left bank cru bourgeois could result in a clear profit of about $600 per bottle. Be careful!


What does that have to do with Broadbent?

If w+a and Michael Broadbent missed a counterfeit wine, then perhaps it's more difficult to recognize counterfeit wines than one might realize!

Broadbent was also my first wine critic of repute!
 
Posts: 6938 | Location: Germantown, Tennessee | Registered: Oct 25, 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by wine+art:
Random House apologized, accepted all allegations were untrue, and paid Broadbent money.

What have I misread?



You originally wrote that Broadbent was "cleared of any wrongdoing" which is decidedly not the case. This never went to trial and that wasn't necessarily going to be determined at trial in any event.

I haven't read the settlement agreement or the lawsuit filings. However, this article provides some details. Broadbent "claimed in his suit that the book falsely depicts him as complicit in a crime." I read the book and didn't see it doing so. It is those allegations that Random has apologized for and said were untrue.

As I see this, Broadbent sued under the generous libel laws saying that Random house said a bunch of libelous things. Random house viewed a settlement as economically prudent. It was easy for them to disavow things that weren't in the book but only in Broadbent's charges.

Neil
 
Posts: 543 | Location: Forest Hills, NY | Registered: Aug 15, 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Neil K.:
quote:
Originally posted by wine+art:
Random House apologized, accepted all allegations were untrue, and paid Broadbent money.

What have I misread?



You originally wrote that Broadbent was "cleared of any wrongdoing" which is decidedly not the case. This never went to trial and that wasn't necessarily going to be determined at trial in any event.

I haven't read the settlement agreement or the lawsuit filings. However, this article provides some details. Broadbent "claimed in his suit that the book falsely depicts him as complicit in a crime." I read the book and didn't see it doing so. It it those allegations that Random has apologized for and said were untrue.

As I see this, Broadbent sued under the generous libel laws saying that Random house said a bunch of libelous things. Random house viewed a settlement as economically prudent. It was easy for them to disavow things that weren't in the book but only in Broadbent's charges.

Neil


And from what I gathered, the book is still being published and distributed in the US. From my view of the book, had he brought the claims in the US, he would have been thrown out of Court. And, unless the parts of the book about Rodenstock's assistant gathering the corks was not true, the entire episode should have reeked to high heaven to anyone paying attention
 
Posts: 2689 | Location: South Florida | Registered: Dec 30, 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
For US readers, Wallace has he say on those points here. I agree about collecting the corks and a few other things in terms of raising suspicions. However, everyone wanted these wines to be genuine. I'm sure we can all think of similar situations where our hopes got the better of us.

As for Broadbent, I view him as an old school gentlemen who was unwittingly duped but refuses to see it that way for understandable reasons.

Neil
 
Posts: 543 | Location: Forest Hills, NY | Registered: Aug 15, 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Board-O:
I haven't followed this at all, but I have great admiration for Michael Broadbent. He was my guide when I began collecting and learning about wine.


A few years ago at a tasting in NYC, had an opportunity to meet him and get his book autographed. Book is in a prominent place on my book shelf.

Love his reviews and background explaining wines.


__________________
Ed Bowers
Live simply, Laugh often, Wine a lot!!!
 
Posts: 2798 | Location: Palm Beach Gardens FL | Registered: Nov 05, 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
  Powered by Eve Community  
 

Wine Spectator Online    Wine Spectator Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Travel and Entertainment    Michael Broadbent Wins!

© Wine Spectator Online 2009