Go 
|
New 
|
Find 
|
Notify 
|
|
Reply 
|
|
Admin 
|
New PM! 
|
Member
|
Tough question. Outside of 1997, when he was just stupid good, he has never been super spectacular. That said, he has generally been pretty darn good day in and day out, year in and year out. In a lot of ways, he was the cornerstone of the staff for many, many years without being the #1 guy. The big guns would stumble, and the Yanks would lose a few, the he would step in and right the ship.
He's thrown a lot of quality games for them, but he remains hard to categorize when you start talking "greatest" lists.
|
| |
|
Member
|
I am not a serious Yankee fan. Not a Yankee fan at all. But, I saw Whitey Ford pitch and Mel Stottlemyer. Both were terrific pitchers. You didn't mention Waite Hoyt, who was a great Yankee pitcher who is in the Hall of Fame. Played for the Yankees in the 1920's or so. Had 10 seasons with the Yankees and was in double digits in wins each year. Lifetime ERA was under 3.60. And, if you want to go back, the Yankees had a heck of a ball player years ago who was a terrific pitcher. Started 148 games in his career, although nearly all of his starts were NOT with the Yankees, and he had a 2.28 ERA. Finished his career with a 94-46 record on the mound. The guy could hit a little also. Name was Ruth. Babe Ruth, that is. It is tough to compare from one generation to another. Here are Mr. Hoyt's stats: http://www.baseball-almanac.co...layer.php?p=hoytwa01
Irwin
99% of lawyers give the rest of us a bad name.
|
| |
| Posts: 4203 | Location: Baltimore, MD | Registered: Feb 04, 2003 |    |
|
Member
|
Quite a few notches behind HOF’er Don Sutton. (and just to clarify, I'm not a Yank fan.)
___________________________________________________ It's good to try them young too and then let them age - James Suckling Infanticide can be very satisfying - Robert Parker I drink mine young to avoid disappointments - James Laube
|
| |
| Posts: 5059 | Location: Atlanta, GA | Registered: Jun 03, 2004 |    |
|
Member
|
quote: Originally posted by Icewino: Not a Yankees fan at all so maybe true fans don't consider them "real" Yankees but what about Clemens and Randy Johnson, or even Mussina for that matter.
While Randy Johnson is a great pitcher all-time, his time with the Yankees is generally considered a failure.
|
| |
|
Member
|
I'll chime in as a city resident. I would think this question is properly framed as focusing on what each pitcher did with the Yankees. In that regard, this link will be helpful. Pettite is towards the tops in most of the counting stats (wins, IP, Ks) but not really close in any of the rate stats (ERA, ERA+, WHIP, etc.). Neil
|
| |
| Posts: 543 | Location: Forest Hills, NY | Registered: Aug 15, 2006 |    |
|
Member
|
quote: Originally posted by irwin: I am not a serious Yankee fan. Not a Yankee fan at all. But, I saw Whitey Ford pitch and Mel Stottlemyer. Both were terrific pitchers. You didn't mention Waite Hoyt, who was a great Yankee pitcher who is in the Hall of Fame. Played for the Yankees in the 1920's or so. Had 10 seasons with the Yankees and was in double digits in wins each year. Lifetime ERA was under 3.60. And, if you want to go back, the Yankees had a heck of a ball player years ago who was a terrific pitcher. Started 148 games in his career, although nearly all of his starts were NOT with the Yankees, and he had a 2.28 ERA. Finished his career with a 94-46 record on the mound. The guy could hit a little also. Name was Ruth. Babe Ruth, that is. It is tough to compare from one generation to another. Here are Mr. Hoyt's stats: http://www.baseball-almanac.co...layer.php?p=hoytwa01
Irwin, it's funny that I've never heard of Waite Hoyt until I saw the list of winningest pitchers for the Yankees. And how can I forget the Babe ... I was thinking about him, but I didn't have the time to confirm if he actually pitched for the Yankees. It looks like he did pitch a few games, but his pitchiing prowess was used during his stint with the Red Sux.
|
| |
| Posts: 1425 | Location: New Jersey | Registered: Aug 05, 2007 |    |
|
Member
|
quote: Originally posted by Icewino: Not a Yankees fan at all so maybe true fans don't consider them "real" Yankees but what about Clemens and Randy Johnson, or even Mussina for that matter.
Although Clemens and Mussina won more games than John and Abbott, I remember the latter two growing up, and both made a more impression on me than Clemens and Mussina. Johnson just flat out disappointed, but it's definitely not a reflection of his career.
|
| |
| Posts: 1425 | Location: New Jersey | Registered: Aug 05, 2007 |    |
|
Member
|
At this point, no. If he puts together two more great years, maybe with another WS title (after this curremt one), then maybe. Unfortunately, longevity counts for almost as much as talent. There are people in the Hall who don't belong there (Sutton) and others not in the Hall who do belong there (Blyleven, Morris, Dawson).
Just one more sip.
|
| |
|
Member
|
See this article from the creator of baseball-reference. He argues that Pettite falls short of the Hall and believes he'll need 300 wins to get there. BTW, comments on the article are very entertaining. Follow-up question...Mussina in the Hall?
|
| |
| Posts: 543 | Location: Forest Hills, NY | Registered: Aug 15, 2006 |    |
|
Member
|
quote: Originally posted by Neil K.: Follow-up question...Mussina in the Hall?
TominNYC should be chiming in soon. 
Romeo and Juliet are together in eternity....
|
| |
| Posts: 6094 | Location: Elk Grove, CA, USA | Registered: Dec 06, 2003 |    |
|
Member
|
quote: Originally posted by Jcocktosten: Personally, I think not for Mussina - consistently good for a long time - shrank from the spotlight, never came up in the clutch (except for that one regular season duel against Pedro Labor Day 2001), was never considered the dominant pitcher in the league.
Dude, you are nuts. Mussina’s first postseason appearance came in 1996, his 6th season, and was a disappointing performance in two starts, one each in the division and championship series. Combined, he was 0-1, with a 5.27 ERA. He didn’t have to wait long for a chance to make up for that sub par performance, as his team made the post again the following year. Moose’s dominance in the 1997 postseason cannot be overstated. He began the 1997 postseason with two ALDS starts against the M’s, going 7 innings in each start, while allowing a total of 3 runs and posting 16 k’s. He was 2-0. In the ALCS, he stepped into unhittable territory. In his two starts, he went 15 innings, allowing only 4 hits, 1 earned run, while punching out 25 of the very dangerous Cleveland lineup. His teammates failed to score a single run for him in either game, eventually losing both in extra innings. His next foray into the post season came with the Yanks in 2001. His first start in the post as a Yankee came in game three of the ALDS, with the Yanks already in an 0-2 hole and facing elimination. Moose rescued his new team by throwing 7 shutout innings and winning a 1-0 nail biter. Moose had a disappointing game 1 start in the ALCS, lasting only 5 2/3 innings, while giving up 4 ER in the loss. He pitched much better in his next start, going 6 2/3 IP, with 10 K’s, but allowed 3 ER’s and was once again out-dueled by Tim Wakefield, who was making his own case for an ALCS MVP award. He had a final chance to contribute in the ’01 ALCS, and he didn’t disappoint. The now famous game 7 match-up between Roger Clemens and Pedro Martinez quickly fell apart for the yanks, as the Sox knocked Clemens around for 4 runs before placing runners on 1st and 3rd with nobody out in the top of the 4th inning. With the Yanks already down by 4 runs, and facing a red hot Pedro Martinez, Moose had to stem the bleeding. He made quick work of Jason Varitek, via strike out, then followed it up by getting Johnny Damon to ground into an inning ending double play. It is safe to say that Moose’s performance once again saved the entire Yankee season. The late inning heroics may never have been enough had he not stopped the Sox from tacking on what appeared to be an easy run in that situation. Moose’s clutch performance helped his team advance to the World Series, where he dominated in his only start, out-dueling fireballer Josh Becket, in route to a 6 to 1 yankee win. Moose went 7 innings, allowed a single run, while striking out 9. His teammates failed to carry their weight and he never got another start in the series. In the 2004 ALDS, Moose battled with Johann Santana, who shut the yanks out, which wasted a very good start by Mussina, who went 7 innings, while allowing 2 ER with 7 K’s. He went on to start game 1 of the rematch in the ALCS with Boston, facing off against Curt Schilling. Moose’s final numbers for that game don’t tell the story at all. Moose dominated. He pitched 7 perfect innings to start the game, staking his team to an 8-0 lead, before tiring (or having a let-down, following the yanks offensive explosion in the bottom of the 7th) with 2 outs and one on in the 8th. He gave up 3 runs before leaving the game in the hands of Tanyon Sturtze, who promptly gave up a HR, giving Moose 4 ER on the game, which was hardly indicative of his overall dominance. His next start was game 5 against Pedro Martinez and he out-dueled the greatest pitcher of his generation through 6 innings, allowing 2 runs with 7 k’s. He would have won the series clinching game if not for the Red Sox 9th inning comeback. Overall Postseason statistics: 9 Lg Div Series GS-10 ERA-3.60 W-4 L-4 0 IP-65 H-61 ER-26 BB-15 K-56 5 Lg Champ Series GS-8 ERA-3.34 W-2 L-3 0 IP-56.2 H-42 ER-21 BB-13 K-66 2 World Series GS-3 ERA-3.00 W-1 L-1 0 IP-18 H-18 ER-6 BB-5 K-23 16 Postseason Ser GS-21 ERA-3.42 W-7 L-8 0 IP-139.2 H-121 ER-53 BB-33 K-145 JAWS analysis by BP’s Jay Jaffe: Mike Mussina: “At 39 and now reduced to employing a fastball that wouldn't get ticketed in a school zone, it's a safe bet that the Moose isn't going to become a member of the 300 win club. Which isn't to say that he doesn't have Hall-worthy numbers, at least from a JAWS standpoint. As with Smoltz but to a lesser extent on both scales, Mussina's ahead on career and short on peak numbers, with PRAR and PRAA numbers (284 and 1221, respectively) that also surpass the benchmarks. What Mussina doesn't have going for him, particularly relative to Smoltz, is the hardware which will augment his much more traditional case: no World Series ring, no Cy Young, no *20-win season (he's had 18 or 19 five times) and "only" five All-Star appearances. His post-season record is "just" 7-8, albeit with a 3.42 ERA and 145 strikeouts in 139 2/3 innings; the fact that his teams have scored just 3.2 runs per game for him is a big reason, and certainly hasn't helped his quest for a ring. In Mussina's favor is a long stretch in which he could lay claim to being one of the league's best pitchers; he finished in the top five of the Cy voting six times from 1992 to 2001, with two sixth-place finishes as well, and has eight top five finishes in ERA, and eight top 10 finishes in strikeouts. While not the equal of Clemens, Johnson, or Martinez, he was one of the league's top-shelf hurlers for a good long time. He's probably facing a tooth-and-nail fight, but it ought to turn out in his favor.” *latest Mussina analysis was made prior to his 20 win 2008 season.
|
| |
|
Member
|
You didn't disappoint Tom!
Romeo and Juliet are together in eternity....
|
| |
| Posts: 6094 | Location: Elk Grove, CA, USA | Registered: Dec 06, 2003 |    |
|
Member
|
And an "atta boy" to you too, Dr. T!!!
Romeo and Juliet are together in eternity....
|
| |
| Posts: 6094 | Location: Elk Grove, CA, USA | Registered: Dec 06, 2003 |    |
|
 | Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
© Wine Spectator Online 2009
|