Wine Spectator Online    Wine Spectator Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Wine Conversations    the Parker or me thread
Page 1 2 3 4 

Closed Topic Closed
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
  Login/Join 
Member
Posted Hide Post
I agree with MiamiAtty, R&RCowboy. I think that Board-O was merely making a suggestion to Gary. I did not read anything offensive at all.


__________________________
Alta is for skiers!
 
Posts: 1882 | Location: o-HIGH-o | Registered: May 05, 2005Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by baja:
Who said anything about coming to take care of Confused you mean GV's in the health care business now also...DAMN Razz Hey I am just responding to his post....still trying to figure out what the hell he needed to start another thread for when there is one right below it with his name already on it. Confused What is today WLTV Day on WS. And as far as being harsh...just giving back what was dished out.


Wow. You should really incorporate more salads into your diet.
 
Posts: 2 | Registered: Mar 03, 2008Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by SS Chris:
Who's Gary Vaynerchuck?


Isn't he a defenseman for the Devils?
 
Posts: 2877 | Location: Rocky Mountains | Registered: Apr 08, 2004Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
I like WLTV and also respect Parkers scores. I think there is room for many, many palates with all the wine being made around the world.
Find one you like and follow him/her.
Kathleen Lisson


Free Wine and Food Pairing Tips at http://kathleenlisson.blogspot.com
 
Posts: 29 | Location: Albany, NY | Registered: Feb 11, 2008Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by SS Chris:
Who's Gary Vaynerchuck?


Good one Chris! Gary V. addressed that above, but nice try.


-IB

PSA: Please report gratuitous trolling/flaming immediately (little triangle at bottom right).
 
Posts: 4256 | Location: Naptown | Registered: Nov 24, 2006Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
Oh brother. Roll Eyes


Fact #1: Gary is a nice guy.
Fact #2: Gary loves wine(just like everyone else on this forum)
Fact #3: Gary has a business that sells wine.
Fact #4: Gary, while he is entertaining, is still selling wine.
Fact #5:Gary, who does not taste blind and because he also sells wine, is NOT in a position to be COMPLETELY objective on the wines he reviews.

Whew!! Kapish?

Parker intentionally prohibits ads in his WA. It is not without reason. WS accepts ads but strictly adheres to tasting blind. Also not without reason.

Gary tastes both non-blind AND sells the stuff. As such, this lack of objectivity is what impairs Gary or anyone else in these circumstances to seriously and credibly consider themselves as wine-critic. Even this discussion is absurd.

No offense Gary as none is intended.


***********************
"I have drunk not to the clouding of my reason, but just so much that I can still surely distinguish the syllables with my tongue." Athenaeus
 
Posts: 2720 | Location: montreal, qc, canada, earth | Registered: Feb 21, 2004Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
As a New Yorker, the problem that I have is that Gary is from New Jersey. That's a pretty big hurdle to get over in order to be taken seriously. Big Grin
 
Posts: 1139 | Location: NYC | Registered: Sep 12, 2005Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by dc13:
Indy - I have always enjoyed your posts HERE and I urge you to participate more over there. You'd be surprised at the level of knowledge and experience some of the members possess . . .


dc13,

Thanks, I appreciate it, I really do. Sometimes (especially after one of my quarterly meltdowns) I do think I might pull the WS plug and migrate over there more. But something always calls me back. There's something to feeling like one of the, if not the most liberal person in a sea of stoic conservatism (Een excepted). The winelibrary forums often feel as if folks are trying to "outcool" each other. Not my gig either, Wink.

Cheers!


-IB

PSA: Please report gratuitous trolling/flaming immediately (little triangle at bottom right).
 
Posts: 4256 | Location: Naptown | Registered: Nov 24, 2006Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Mimik:
Oh brother. Roll Eyes


Fact #1: Gary is a nice guy.
Fact #2: Gary loves wine(just like everyone else on this forum)
Fact #3: Gary has a business that sells wine.
Fact #4: Gary, while he is entertaining, is still selling wine.
Fact #5:Gary, who does not taste blind and because he also sells wine, is NOT in a position to be COMPLETELY objective on the wines he reviews.

Whew!! Kapish?

Parker intentionally prohibits ads in his WA. It is not without reason. WS accepts ads but strictly adheres to tasting blind. Also not without reason.

Gary tastes both non-blind AND sells the stuff. As such, this lack of objectivity is what impairs Gary or anyone else in these circumstances to seriously and credibly consider themselves as wine-critic. Even this discussion is absurd.

No offense Gary as none is intended.


If you question Garys intentions then you have to question the secret nature of WS tastings. I have no problem with either so I'm not trying to challenge you, but the fact that WS sells ads means the same argument applies.
 
Posts: 55 | Location: Roseville, CA | Registered: Apr 26, 2007Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
IndyBob,

You are NOT the only "liberal" person here. Just that the rest of us don't label ourselves that way. Trust me, I've had my share of discussions in the Madder than Hell forum and I frankly believe that politics, unless wine related, really do not have any place here. Some people espouse their politicals views here but I believe a lot of others take notice and avoid those posters.

Just my 3 cents and hope that you stay on.


***********************
"I have drunk not to the clouding of my reason, but just so much that I can still surely distinguish the syllables with my tongue." Athenaeus
 
Posts: 2720 | Location: montreal, qc, canada, earth | Registered: Feb 21, 2004Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Brandon M:
If you question Garys intentions then you have to question the secret nature of WS tastings. I have no problem with either so I'm not trying to challenge you, but the fact that WS sells ads means the same argument applies.
How does the same argument apply? WS sells wine ads, but tastes blind so that influence is mitigated. If Gary tasted blind it would also help mitigate doubt about his objectivity.


“What is the soup du jour?"...It’s the soup of the day..."Mmmm, that sounds good, I’ll have that” - Lloyd Christmas
 
Posts: 1114 | Location: OC, CA (Currently in London) | Registered: Aug 01, 2007Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Brandon M:
If you question Garys intentions then you have to question the secret nature of WS tastings. I have no problem with either so I'm not trying to challenge you, but the fact that WS sells ads means the same argument applies.


First, I don't question Gary's intentions, I am saying that he could not possibly be fully objective given the facts.

Second, I would refrain from using the word "secret" in your post. It has a connotation of sinister or somehow conniving. Please just use blind tastings as that is what they are.

Finally, if you read my post carefully, the fact that WS sells wines is an inherant contradiction with judging wines. As a result, to somewhat remedy this, they taste blind.


***********************
"I have drunk not to the clouding of my reason, but just so much that I can still surely distinguish the syllables with my tongue." Athenaeus
 
Posts: 2720 | Location: montreal, qc, canada, earth | Registered: Feb 21, 2004Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
#1 Trust their own palate and more importantly
#2 Try new things


Again....How true it is.

Keep up the good work Gary.


So much wine.....so little time!!!
 
Posts: 5812 | Location: San Francisco | Registered: Jun 20, 2002Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Associate Editor
WineSpectator.com
 
Posted Hide Post
Just to clarify Mimik's statement, while we do have advertising in our magazine and on WineSpectator.com, Wine Spectator does not sell wines.

RT
 
Posts: 245 | Location: New York | Registered: Jun 13, 2006Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Mimik:
quote:
Originally posted by Brandon M:
If you question Garys intentions then you have to question the secret nature of WS tastings. I have no problem with either so I'm not trying to challenge you, but the fact that WS sells ads means the same argument applies.


First, I don't question Gary's intentions, I am saying that he could not possibly be fully objective given the facts.

Second, I would refrain from using the word "secret" in your post. It has a connotation of sinister or somehow conniving. Please just use blind tastings as that is what they are.

Finally, if you read my post carefully, the fact that WS sells wines is an inherant contradiction with judging wines. As a result, to somewhat remedy this, they taste blind.


It was not my intention to call a blind taste a "Secret" taste it is my intention to show the difference between Gary and WS. WS may blind taste their wines, but how do I know this for sure? Again, I'm just playing devil's advocate here. Gary tastes right in front of you and WS is tasted in a back room, blind or not.
 
Posts: 55 | Location: Roseville, CA | Registered: Apr 26, 2007Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Fact #1: Gary is a nice guy.
Fact #2: Gary loves wine(just like everyone else on this forum)
Fact #3: Gary has a business that sells wine.
Fact #4: Gary, while he is entertaining, is still selling wine.
Fact #5:Gary, who does not taste blind and because he also sells wine, is NOT in a position to be COMPLETELY objective on the wines he reviews.


and lastly....

Fact #6: None of you are paying for his opinion, so if you don't like it, don't think twice about it, and take your frustration over to a political forum where you do pay for it, whether you like it or not.


So much wine.....so little time!!!
 
Posts: 5812 | Location: San Francisco | Registered: Jun 20, 2002Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by GlennK:
quote:
Originally posted by Brandon M:
If you question Garys intentions then you have to question the secret nature of WS tastings. I have no problem with either so I'm not trying to challenge you, but the fact that WS sells ads means the same argument applies.
How does the same argument apply? WS sells wine ads, but tastes blind so that influence is mitigated. If Gary tasted blind it would also help mitigate doubt about his objectivity.


Glenn - I completely agree with you and have asked Gary to blind taste in the past, but I do feel the argument is the same.
 
Posts: 55 | Location: Roseville, CA | Registered: Apr 26, 2007Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
This back and forth stinks, Please and I am serious lets establish this Wine Spectator rocks, they have help the wine world in many ways, #2 Robert Parker a Legend, honest and amazing, #3 I know who I am and who my parents raised, I know I took care of my $$$ well being a long time ago and i Know why I started WLTV, I soooooooo Know why people would say I am biased and I really appreciate the support of people who care/know me. Bottom Line is this I just hope that in any small way I have helped wine in this country and if I have I am thrilled and I hope everyone can get along, there is no US vs. Them, we are all on the same team Smile Stay well everyone!


trust YOUR palate.
tv.winelibrary.com
 
Posts: 64 | Registered: Aug 13, 2006Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Gary Vaynerchuk:
This back and forth stinks, Please and I am serious lets establish this Wine Spectator rocks, they have help the wine world in many ways, #2 Robert Parker a Legend, honest and amazing, #3 I know who I am and who my parents raised, I know I took care of my $$$ well being a long time ago and i Know why I started WLTV, I soooooooo Know why people would say I am biased and I really appreciate the support of people who care/know me. Bottom Line is this I just hope that in any small way I have helped wine in this country and if I have I am thrilled and I hope everyone can get along, there is no US vs. Them, we are all on the same team Smile Stay well everyone!
 
Posts: 64 | Registered: Aug 13, 2006Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
One thing we know for sure.....Vaynerchuk is a post padder. Big Grin

good to see you indybob!!!!
 
Posts: 25 | Location: New Jersey | Registered: Jul 05, 2007Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
Gary, I think most of the grief you are catching is from Giants bandwagoners who know that you are an outspoken Jets fan.


"Wine is sunlight held together by water" - Galileo
 
Posts: 1076 | Location: Boca Raton, FL | Registered: Dec 29, 2006Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
Mimik,

Well said, and how could I have forgotten! I spoke too soon, as I sometimes do. You're right in that non-wine related politics tend to upset the food chain 'round here. Heck, in an election year, I've been biting my fingers for weeks now, Wink.


-IB

PSA: Please report gratuitous trolling/flaming immediately (little triangle at bottom right).
 
Posts: 4256 | Location: Naptown | Registered: Nov 24, 2006Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Gary Vaynerchuk:
This back and forth stinks, Please and I am serious lets establish this Wine Spectator rocks, they have help the wine world in many ways, #2 Robert Parker a Legend, honest and amazing, #3 I know who I am and who my parents raised, I know I took care of my $$$ well being a long time ago and i Know why I started WLTV, I soooooooo Know why people would say I am biased and I really appreciate the support of people who care/know me. Bottom Line is this I just hope that in any small way I have helped wine in this country and if I have I am thrilled and I hope everyone can get along, there is no US vs. Them, we are all on the same team Smile Stay well everyone!



Gary
You say it from the heart! Carry on please...I like your enthusiasm for wine. These BB's can be a tough place, however, I do feel your approach has opened up the wine perspective for some. I loved your session on 2005 Chateau Angelus follwed by a cheese tasting. I especially appreciate your comments on Bordeaux's. Looking forward to more! Smile
Trev
 
Posts: 34 | Registered: May 29, 2007Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
Yup, he's still a salesman. I do think however Gary would make it great in politics, and I don't mean that as a slam, but he might have to get rid of the sniffy sniffy! Razz
 
Posts: 3651 | Location: minneapolis minnesota usa | Registered: Dec 17, 2003Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Brandon M:
It was not my intention to call a blind taste a "Secret" taste it is my intention to show the difference between Gary and WS. WS may blind taste their wines, but how do I know this for sure? Again, I'm just playing devil's advocate here. Gary tastes right in front of you and WS is tasted in a back room, blind or not.

This is just sad. Roll Eyes

Gary tastes the wine right in front of me, but I don't know if he tries to shake down the winemaker for a good score prior to the tasting. I'm just playing devil's advocate here, so posting my conspiracy theory must be worthwhile.
 
Posts: 1398 | Location: San Diego, CA | Registered: Nov 19, 2005Edit or Delete MessageReport This Post