Wine Spectator Online    Wine Spectator Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Wine Conversations    Sine Qua Non score
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 
bodhi
Member
Posted
I know Parker just gave the 2005 Atlantis syrah 100 points,does anybody know what the Atlantis grenache got?
 
Posts: 148 | Registered: Aug 11, 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
sprnplr
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by bodhi:
I know Parker just gave the 2005 Atlantis syrah 100 points,does anybody know what the Atlantis grenache got?
101 points
 
Posts: 1051 | Location: Jersey City | Registered: Feb 22, 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Vino Fan
Member
Posted Hide Post
The grenache got a 98
 
Posts: 34 | Location: Dallas, TX | Registered: May 01, 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Stefania Wine
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by sprnplr:
quote:
Originally posted by bodhi:
I know Parker just gave the 2005 Atlantis syrah 100 points,does anybody know what the Atlantis grenache got?
101 points


I'm pretty sure it was 101+


Paul Romero (tlily)- Owner, Winemaker, Tour Guide
Stefania Wine
http://www.stefaniawine.com
 
Posts: 5011 | Location: San Jose | Registered: May 24, 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
dannyk8232
Member
Posted Hide Post
Drinking window 2055 thru 2188.


______________________________________
I'm throwin' rocks tonight. Mark it, Dude.
 
Posts: 1117 | Location: Calabasas, CA | Registered: Mar 21, 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
stickman
Member
Posted Hide Post
Since I just buy my allocation from the mailing list and no more, Parker's official score doesn't really matter that much to me, but I must admit I'm intrigued. I know his original score was 95-7, so his recent 100-point score is a surprise to me. I've seen him adjust scores over time but never like this. Was there any explanation as to why the score changed so dramatically? Is this possibly Jay Miller's assessment? I'm more interested in his impressions about how the wine develops than in the numbers he assigns to them, but any information would be greatly appreciated.


De gustibus non est disputandum.
 
Posts: 959 | Location: Denver, CO | Registered: Jan 02, 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
inky
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by stickman:
Since I just buy my allocation from the mailing list and no more, Parker's official score doesn't really matter that much to me, but I must admit I'm intrigued. I know his original score was 95-7, so his recent 100-point score is a surprise to me. I've seen him adjust scores over time but never like this. Was there any explanation as to why the score changed so dramatically? Is this possibly Jay Miller's assessment? I'm more interested in his impressions about how the wine develops than in the numbers he assigns to them, but any information would be greatly appreciated.

If this score was in the recent release of Rhone Ranger reviews, it was RMP himself who did the reviews.


"You throw a rock, I'm going to throw a concrete block back"
 
Posts: 684 | Registered: Oct 15, 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
 Previous Topic | Next Topic powered by eve community  
 

Wine Spectator Online    Wine Spectator Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Wine Conversations    Sine Qua Non score

© Wine Spectator Online 2006