Wine Spectator Online    Wine Spectator Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Wine Conversations    Oops, you shoulda paid attention to the rules
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 
Member
Posted
Sonoma County Harvest Fair annual wine judging for local juice had someone either not paying attention or trying to cheat.

I guess the rules only matter if you win, and Adler Fels won big. Then lost.

Press Democrat article
 
Posts: 499 | Location: Santa Rosa, CA | Registered: Oct 29, 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
Is the primary point of the contest to recognize good wine or to be a marketing tool?
 
Posts: 801 | Location: NY | Registered: Dec 09, 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
What gets me is the 75-case floor. At 75 cs., that wine wouldn't get past the winery's gift shop w/respect to accessibility. I love it when WS gives a 97 pt. score and a "highly recommended" to something or other that has a 42 cs. production run, or there are 10 cases imported....as if!


"Question with boldness even the existence of a god; because if there be one he must approve of the homage of reason more than that of blindfolded fear. "
-Thomas Jefferson, letter to Peter Carr, August 10, 1787
 
Posts: 3624 | Location: Alpharetta, GA | Registered: Nov 17, 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by kybo:
What gets me is the 75-case floor. At 75 cs., that wine wouldn't get past the winery's gift shop w/respect to accessibility. I love it when WS gives a 97 pt. score and a "highly recommended" to something or other that has a 42 cs. production run, or there are 10 cases imported....as if!


WA has the same issue re # of cases imported. But understand that these are both internatioanl magazines, so figure that someone else would get the balance of the goods. It would take a degree of effort but at least they should report where 75% of these are routed too.

I gave up ages ago with the WS weekly splash report. Agin marginal production,and no hope of getting them.


__________________
Ed Bowers
Live simply, Laugh often, Wine a lot!!!
 
Posts: 2805 | Location: Palm Beach Gardens FL | Registered: Nov 05, 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
I'm not really worried about where the other 75% goes. However, if a wine is produced in so little quantity as to only be accessible to a microscopically small percentage of wine drinkers, then what's the point? Oh, other than to amp up the secondary market prices... Mad


"Question with boldness even the existence of a god; because if there be one he must approve of the homage of reason more than that of blindfolded fear. "
-Thomas Jefferson, letter to Peter Carr, August 10, 1787
 
Posts: 3624 | Location: Alpharetta, GA | Registered: Nov 17, 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
I have to disagree. As a burg lover ultra-small production is a part of the game, so I don't mind that they review very small production wines as long as they review across the entire accessibility range. Plus, stumbling across rare gems is always a nice surprise, and it's good to perhaps have seen a review of the wine, or a similar wine, or perhaps a different vintage even when such an opportunity arises.
 
Posts: 258 | Registered: Mar 20, 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
There would no point (much less) in buying their magazine if they including too many small production wines in their lists.. especially top 100.
 
Posts: 85 | Location: Ottawa, Ontario | Registered: Jul 03, 2009Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
  Powered by Eve Community  
 

Wine Spectator Online    Wine Spectator Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Wine Conversations    Oops, you shoulda paid attention to the rules

© Wine Spectator Online 2009