Go 
|
New 
|
Find 
|
Notify 
|
|
Reply 
|
|
Admin 
|
New PM! 
|
Member
|
Had the 2006 Sarah's Blend at a blind tasting recently and for me it was the wine of the night. Nice and ripe but balanced and nuanced. Strangely, I had it at a barbecue soon after that and it was rather blah. Strange to have bottle variation under screw cap. And this was before I had any food, so I don't think it was the barbecue sauce that threw me off! ==================================================
Punch it , Chewie!
|
| |
| Posts: 376 | Location: Edmonton | Registered: Jul 15, 2008 |    |
|
Member
|
I opened up an '02 or '03 Sarah's Blend several months ago, and it was utterly undrinkable. I was wondering about these wines myself. They do seem to have lost their cache' in recent years.
*********** "I was thinking how nothing lasts. And what a shame that is." --Benjamin Button
|
| |
| Posts: 3722 | Location: Everett, WA | Registered: Mar 08, 2002 |    |
|
Member
|
|
| |
| Posts: 425 | Location: Hermosa Beach, California | Registered: Oct 19, 2007 |    |
|
Member
|
Drank a 2002 #9 a few months back and it was not very good. If it was $10, I would have been happy. However according to Parker's recent Aussie retrospective, Aussie wines clearly age well, my 52 degree wine fridge must have cooked this one, along with the 2000 Dead Arm I had at about the same time.
Daniel Posner
|
| |
| Posts: 199 | Location: New York | Registered: May 06, 2002 |    |
|
Member
|
quote: Originally posted by NY Retailer: Drank a 2002 #9 a few months back and it was not very good. If it was $10, I would have been happy.
However according to Parker's recent Aussie retrospective, Aussie wines clearly age well, my 52 degree wine fridge must have cooked this one, along with the 2000 Dead Arm I had at about the same time.  Should've kept 'em at 51...
______________________________________ I'm throwin' rocks tonight. Mark it, Dude.
|
| |
| Posts: 2504 | Location: San Luis Obispo, CA | Registered: Mar 21, 2007 |    |
|
Member
|
A quick check of CT shows I have drank 13 bottles of 04, 05, and 06 MP in the last 2.5 years (when I joined CT). I have been drinking this since the 01 vintage. I scored the last three vintages between 87 and 89 and prefer the Chris Ringland version to the Sparky Marquis version as it is more dialed down. I was buying the 06 for $11 and found it to be a great QPR wine with burgers, etc. on a weeknight. I'm glad the buzz has gone away to create that kind of value. Haven't bought any 07 as I can't get for less than $14 now and there are other wines I would buy at that price. Also had the 02 9 most recently in early 07 that Dan mentioned, but I thought it was an excellent wine, as do the vast majority of those on CT who have had it.
"Wine is bottled poetry." - Robert Louis Stevenson
|
| |
| Posts: 1648 | Location: Boca Raton, FL | Registered: Dec 29, 2006 |    |
|
Member
|
The big question is... who uses what pronunciation? Mar-kee or mar-kwis Customers get confused when i say it mar-kwis
If you're young and conservative, you have no heart. If you're old and liberal, you have no brain.
|
| |
| Posts: 507 | Location: Houston | Registered: Apr 01, 2009 |    |
|
 | Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
© Wine Spectator Online 2009
|