Wine Spectator Forums
Wine Conversations
New World, Old World, or somewhere in between? Where do you stand?|
Go
![]() |
New
![]() |
Find
![]() |
Notify
![]() |
Tools
![]() |
Reply
![]() |
|
|
Member |
I have a much stronger preferance for the Old World style of wines. Several from Bordeaux, and only a few from California. These big high alcohol wines regardless of how much they cost, if I get one, the chances are it will be opened within a week. These high alcohol wines coming from California and other regions around the world as well I would not trust to cellar more than 3 to 7 years.
*********************** BOYCOTT TYSON CHICKEN!! |
|||
|
|
Member |
I think it has more to do with being a fad than climate. The latest Bordeaux varietal offerings from Clos du Val are 13.5% and their Pinot is 13.5% as well. The latest Corison Cabernet checks in at 13.4%, '03 Mayacamas 13.5% and '05 Monte Bello 13.4% Others such as Togni, Graeser and some others as well have kept alcohol lower in spite of the high alcohol trends. *********************** BOYCOTT TYSON CHICKEN!! |
|||
|
|
Member |
PetiteSyrahFan...
You bring up a good point. There are certainly some out there. They just don't get much press anymore. Even Ridge or Togni (old timers that still get good reviews) seem to get overshadowed by the Colgins, Bonds, Kapcsandy's, etc... So much wine.....so little time!!! |
|||
|
|
Member |
I mean you no offense Petite, but I just find this silly. As has been hashed, rehashed, and hashed again, it's all about balance, not about a number. If a wine reaches 15% abv but is able to maintain balance, and of course, has the structural components for aging, it will age as well as a wine of 13%. If, on the other hand, the wine has achieved that 15% through over-extraction, and it becomes all about fruit and lacks structure, then sure it will fall apart in short order. There are plenty of examples of relatively high alcohol wines aging beautifully - take just one example, a recent retrospective tasting of 1978 California Cabernet, written up by Richard Jennings, a man with an excellent palate. Note the highest rated wine in the first lineup - a 1978 Ridge Jimsomare, clocking in at 15.3%. In any case, sorry for sidetracking a bit, I know alcohol and aging isn't the topic of this thread. ---------------------- 2008 - the end of an error |
|||
|
|
Member |
Spot on, Eric! Well said. |
|||
|
|
Member |
|
|||
|
|
Member |
Wow, I never thought my two word answer to the question in this thread would cause me to receive 9 emails today.
Please allow me to elaborate. The New World vs. Old World question is a varietal question for my palate. Let me give more detail... White Wine: Riesling: German & Alsace Gewurztraminer: Alsace Pinot Gris: Alsace Sauvignon Blanc: Bordeaux & Loire Semillion: Bordeaux Viognier: Rhone Marsanne & Roussanne: Rhone Gruner Veltliner: Austria Chennin Blanc: Loire Grenache Blanc: Rhone & Spain Chardonnay: Burgundy & California Dessert Wines: Barsac/Sauternes Loire Port Germany Italy, Vin Santo Austria Sparkling Wine: Champagne. Red: Grenache: Rhone & Spain Pinot: Burgundy & Oregon Merlot: Bordeaux & Italy Cabernet Franc: Loire & Italy Sangiovese/ Sangio Clone: Italy Syrah: Rhone & Washington Tempranillo: Spain Barbera: Italy Mourvedre: Rhone & Languedoc. Nebbiolo: Italy Cabernet Sauvignon: Bordeaux, Napa & Italy. To me, it is all about where the finest of each varietal in the world is being produced, period. I really do not understand why we are even having this conversation, with all due respect! w+a |
|||
|
|
Member |
Sooooo.....you're saying both then. |
|||
|
|
Member |
NOPE. I listed some 28+- varietal/styles, and only 3 New World were even mentioned. |
|||
|
|
Member |
i prefer old world overwhelmingly.
like most here though, i admire a well made wine no matter where it's from, if the winemaker was aiming for a new world style, and it's in balance with a terrific nose, taste and finish, i will gladly admire the artists work. |
|||
|
|
Member |
That is a very interesting question... hmm...
Let's put it on this terms: my heart is at the Old World but my wallet is at the New World... Seriously though, for me, both have incredible styles and they both deserve a place in my cellar. Here is to great wines, expensive watches and... low APR credit cards... |
|||
|
|
Member |
Tisk tisk W+A, you should know better than this ---------------------- 2008 - the end of an error |
|||
|
|
Member |
This climate change is why our table wines taste like port line is getting old. Take Italian merlot for example. Now most will agree that the best versions are grown on the Tuscan coast, but it is planted throughout the country. Now there are stylistic differences to be sure, however it can be successful from the cool mountains of the Veneto to the hot arid climate of Sicily. There is a natural temperature difference between those two regions that even the most rabid global warming proponant would never suggest Napa will, or most certainly has seen.
"A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough to take everything you have." Gerald Ford |
|||
|
|
Member |
2nd that...but that being said...recently if its not from Burgundy, I'm new world all the way. Since most have been from Oregon however...I take the somewhere in between! At least they aren't known for the 15%+ monster Pinots |
|||
|
|
Member |
I've definitely found I prefer more old world wines, but I also strongly ditto Eric's post.
But that's answering the thread title and not the posted question. I don't think those hyper-ripe beasts represent new world wines - they're at the fringe. And my opinion is that they are phasing out of style. RMP is on his way to a front porch rocker, and I don't think that Laube is a market driver for these wines. |
|||
|
|
Member |
Unless the grape is Pinot Noir, which is why I shy toward Oregon these days! |
|||
|
|
Member |
Very true Eric. There are balanced wines at all levels of alcohol, tannin, dry extract, etc. Some more thoughts: This is where the art and science of winemaking blur. There is no # to indicate "phenolic ripeness" although the term is used all the time. And it seems that one man's "phenolic ripeness" is another's "over-ripe". There is also no # to indicate how much or little tannin, acid, etc. equates to "balance". And, some varietals/regions do better at higher alcohols than others. Rhone can regularly clock in at 15+% and not come off as out of balance, and do well with a meal. Yet, it's rare when I find a 15+% Cab. that I would say isn't out of balance to some degree, and quite often seems manipulated to the extent that it's challenging to appreciate on it's own let alone with food. Certain varietals/regions achieve a higher alcohol level naturally, and others do so with extended hang times/raisining and un-natural manipulation. What irks me is that many out there attempt to achieve certain phenolics/tannins/sugar levels regardless of what mother nature is allowing for in that given year, and despite what is best suited to the region, site, or microclimate the wine is being made in. This "forcing" has great winemakers, and properties in California, and other places, IMHO, not putting their best foot forward. So much wine.....so little time!!! |
|||
|
|
Member |
I think we saw some of this in the 2007 Bordeaux vintage where some producers were over extracting in an effort to make more concentrated wines. JS discussed this and commented on how those that took what the vintage gave them made the best wines. |
|||
|
|
Member |
Here's a little article: http://www.wineanorak.com/alcohollevelsrising.htm One point mentioned in the article is:
That article surely does not claim to be the undisputed truth. Also i understand DRAB is not just talking about natural sugar levels. Slainte Mhath! |
|||
|
|
Member |
Seemingly a very iformed article. Thanks for sharing it! While there are certainly data points that are meaurable (sugar level, acid, tannins, etc.) What I think becomes difficult is how these are interpreted. What may be physiologically ripe or ripe based on sugar levels to one grower, vineyard manager or winemaker may be different to another. So much wine.....so little time!!! |
|||
|
|
Member |
I don't think it is as simple as all this
My three favorite producers in Piedmont are: La Spinetta (as 'New World' as it gets in Piedmont) Sandrone (right down the middle) Giacosa (almost as 'Old World' as it gets) I can appreciate, but I'm not a huge fan of the Old World styled Napa Cabs (Berigner PR, Montelena, etc). But I'm also not ga-ga over the overripe New World stuff, either. My preference is for the Ripe Napa fruit that is yet balanced and not overdone -- Harlan, Araujo, KL and KL Reserves, Etude, etc. I don't like almost all Australian Shiraz and Cabernet. I can say, categorically, that I do not like overripe, nor out-of-balance wines. I can say that my preference is for Champagne, Rhones, Burgundies, and Italians. But, whithin the context of what I would define as well-made wines, it is hard for me to pre-judge a wine based upon its style. And, again, I find this especially true in the Piedmont, which is just about my favorite region on earth, where my 3 favorite wineries really represent three incredibly opposing incredibly opposing ideas on this issue. "What contemptible scoundrel stole the cork from my lunch?" -- W.C. Fields |
|||
|