Wine Spectator Online    Wine Spectator Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Wine Conversations    New World, Old World, or somewhere in between? Where do you stand?
Page 1 2 3 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 
Member
Posted Hide Post
I have a much stronger preferance for the Old World style of wines. Several from Bordeaux, and only a few from California. These big high alcohol wines regardless of how much they cost, if I get one, the chances are it will be opened within a week. These high alcohol wines coming from California and other regions around the world as well I would not trust to cellar more than 3 to 7 years.


***********************
BOYCOTT TYSON CHICKEN!!
 
Posts: 880 | Registered: Mar 21, 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by MoselleLuxemburg:
Craft or climate ?
I think the climate plays a big role in the evolution of the current wine style, both in the old and the new world. You'll find many 13.5 - 14.5 % vol wines in French regions that had 1 - 1.5 lower levels some 10 years ago.

As much as i like the old world style, i like diversity. As already pointed out, there are limits.


I think it has more to do with being a fad than climate. The latest Bordeaux varietal offerings from Clos du Val are 13.5% and their Pinot is 13.5% as well. The latest Corison Cabernet checks in at 13.4%, '03 Mayacamas 13.5% and '05 Monte Bello 13.4% Others such as Togni, Graeser and some others as well have kept alcohol lower in spite of the high alcohol trends.


***********************
BOYCOTT TYSON CHICKEN!!
 
Posts: 880 | Registered: Mar 21, 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
PetiteSyrahFan...

You bring up a good point. There are certainly some out there. They just don't get much press anymore. Even Ridge or Togni (old timers that still get good reviews) seem to get overshadowed by the Colgins, Bonds, Kapcsandy's, etc...


So much wine.....so little time!!!
 
Posts: 5815 | Location: San Francisco | Registered: Jun 20, 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by PetiteSyrahFan:
These high alcohol wines coming from California and other regions around the world as well I would not trust to cellar more than 3 to 7 years.

I mean you no offense Petite, but I just find this silly. As has been hashed, rehashed, and hashed again, it's all about balance, not about a number. If a wine reaches 15% abv but is able to maintain balance, and of course, has the structural components for aging, it will age as well as a wine of 13%. If, on the other hand, the wine has achieved that 15% through over-extraction, and it becomes all about fruit and lacks structure, then sure it will fall apart in short order.

There are plenty of examples of relatively high alcohol wines aging beautifully - take just one example, a recent retrospective tasting of 1978 California Cabernet, written up by Richard Jennings, a man with an excellent palate. Note the highest rated wine in the first lineup - a 1978 Ridge Jimsomare, clocking in at 15.3%.

In any case, sorry for sidetracking a bit, I know alcohol and aging isn't the topic of this thread.


----------------------
2008 - the end of an error
 
Posts: 4314 | Location: San Ramon, California | Registered: May 07, 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Eric White:
As in wine itself, it is all about balance - old world, new world, they both have their place, and I'd miss either equally if I had to do without.

Spot on, Eric! Well said.
 
Posts: 4154 | Location: Montreal, QC & MI | Registered: Feb 17, 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Mimik:
I used to like Aussie fruit bombs(I guess everyone gets serious into wine from the modern, overripe fruit versions) and later as my palate became more sophisticated......

Confused Was this last week, or the one prior? Razz
 
Posts: 4154 | Location: Montreal, QC & MI | Registered: Feb 17, 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
Wow, I never thought my two word answer to the question in this thread would cause me to receive 9 emails today. Smile

Please allow me to elaborate. The New World vs. Old World question is a varietal question for my palate.

Let me give more detail...

White Wine:

Riesling: German & Alsace
Gewurztraminer: Alsace
Pinot Gris: Alsace
Sauvignon Blanc: Bordeaux & Loire
Semillion: Bordeaux
Viognier: Rhone
Marsanne & Roussanne: Rhone
Gruner Veltliner: Austria
Chennin Blanc: Loire
Grenache Blanc: Rhone & Spain
Chardonnay: Burgundy & California

Dessert Wines:

Barsac/Sauternes
Loire
Port
Germany
Italy, Vin Santo
Austria

Sparkling Wine:

Champagne.

Red:

Grenache: Rhone & Spain
Pinot: Burgundy & Oregon
Merlot: Bordeaux & Italy
Cabernet Franc: Loire & Italy
Sangiovese/ Sangio Clone: Italy
Syrah: Rhone & Washington
Tempranillo: Spain
Barbera: Italy
Mourvedre: Rhone & Languedoc.
Nebbiolo: Italy
Cabernet Sauvignon: Bordeaux, Napa & Italy.

To me, it is all about where the finest of each varietal in the world is being produced, period.

I really do not understand why we are even having this conversation, with all due respect! Razz Wink

w+a
 
Posts: 9793 | Location: Dallas TX. | Registered: Feb 21, 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by wine+art:
White Wine:
Chardonnay: Burgundy & California

Red:
Pinot: Burgundy & Oregon
Syrah: Rhone & Washington

w+a

Sooooo.....you're saying both then. Cool Big Grin
 
Posts: 4154 | Location: Montreal, QC & MI | Registered: Feb 17, 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by KSC02:
quote:
Originally posted by wine+art:
White Wine:
Chardonnay: Burgundy & California

Red:
Pinot: Burgundy & Oregon
Syrah: Rhone & Washington

w+a

Sooooo.....you're saying both then. Cool Big Grin



NOPE. I listed some 28+- varietal/styles, and only 3 New World were even mentioned. Wink
 
Posts: 9793 | Location: Dallas TX. | Registered: Feb 21, 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
i prefer old world overwhelmingly.

like most here though, i admire a well made wine no matter where it's from, if the winemaker was aiming for a new world style, and it's in balance with a terrific nose, taste and finish, i will gladly admire the artists work.
 
Posts: 14 | Location: pompano beach, fl | Registered: Aug 21, 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
That is a very interesting question... hmm...

Let's put it on this terms: my heart is at the Old World but my wallet is at the New World... Smile

Seriously though, for me, both have incredible styles and they both deserve a place in my cellar.


Here is to great wines, expensive watches and... low APR credit cards...
 
Posts: 60 | Location: San Anton, TX | Registered: Jan 24, 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by wine+art:
Dessert Wines:


Tisk tisk W+A, you should know better than this Razz. Those are "sweet" wines, not "dessert" wines... Wink


----------------------
2008 - the end of an error
 
Posts: 4314 | Location: San Ramon, California | Registered: May 07, 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
This climate change is why our table wines taste like port line is getting old. Take Italian merlot for example. Now most will agree that the best versions are grown on the Tuscan coast, but it is planted throughout the country. Now there are stylistic differences to be sure, however it can be successful from the cool mountains of the Veneto to the hot arid climate of Sicily. There is a natural temperature difference between those two regions that even the most rabid global warming proponant would never suggest Napa will, or most certainly has seen.


"A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough to take everything you have." Gerald Ford
 
Posts: 1948 | Location: Vermont | Registered: Sep 10, 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Jcocktosten:
quote:
Originally posted by Eric White:
As in wine itself, it is all about balance - old world, new world, they both have their place, and I'd miss either equally if I had to do without.


Not surprised, Eric put it better than I would. I completely agree


2nd that...but that being said...recently if its not from Burgundy, I'm new world all the way. Since most have been from Oregon however...I take the somewhere in between! At least they aren't known for the 15%+ monster Pinots
 
Posts: 1639 | Location: Tampa, FL | Registered: Jan 27, 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
I've definitely found I prefer more old world wines, but I also strongly ditto Eric's post.

But that's answering the thread title and not the posted question. I don't think those hyper-ripe beasts represent new world wines - they're at the fringe. And my opinion is that they are phasing out of style. RMP is on his way to a front porch rocker, and I don't think that Laube is a market driver for these wines.
 
Posts: 1399 | Location: San Diego, CA | Registered: Nov 19, 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
I don't think that Laube is a market driver for these wines


Unless the grape is Pinot Noir, which is why I shy toward Oregon these days!
 
Posts: 1639 | Location: Tampa, FL | Registered: Jan 27, 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
I mean you no offense Petite, but I just find this silly. As has been hashed, rehashed, and hashed again, it's all about balance, not about a number. If a wine reaches 15% abv but is able to maintain balance, and of course, has the structural components for aging, it will age as well as a wine of 13%. If, on the other hand, the wine has achieved that 15% through over-extraction, and it becomes all about fruit and lacks structure, then sure it will fall apart in short order.


Very true Eric. There are balanced wines at all levels of alcohol, tannin, dry extract, etc.

Some more thoughts:

This is where the art and science of winemaking blur. There is no # to indicate "phenolic ripeness" although the term is used all the time. And it seems that one man's "phenolic ripeness" is another's "over-ripe". There is also no # to indicate how much or little tannin, acid, etc. equates to "balance".

And, some varietals/regions do better at higher alcohols than others. Rhone can regularly clock in at 15+% and not come off as out of balance, and do well with a meal. Yet, it's rare when I find a 15+% Cab. that I would say isn't out of balance to some degree, and quite often seems manipulated to the extent that it's challenging to appreciate on it's own let alone with food. Certain varietals/regions achieve a higher alcohol level naturally, and others do so with extended hang times/raisining and un-natural manipulation.

What irks me is that many out there attempt to achieve certain phenolics/tannins/sugar levels regardless of what mother nature is allowing for in that given year, and despite what is best suited to the region, site, or microclimate the wine is being made in. This "forcing" has great winemakers, and properties in California, and other places, IMHO, not putting their best foot forward.


So much wine.....so little time!!!
 
Posts: 5815 | Location: San Francisco | Registered: Jun 20, 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
What irks me is that many out there attempt to achieve certain phenolics/tannins/sugar levels regardless of what mother nature is allowing for in that given year, and despite what is best suited to the region, site, or microclimate the wine is being made in. This "forcing" has great winemakers, and properties in California, and other places, IMHO, not putting their best foot forward.


I think we saw some of this in the 2007 Bordeaux vintage where some producers were over extracting in an effort to make more concentrated wines. JS discussed this and commented on how those that took what the vintage gave them made the best wines.
 
Posts: 1005 | Location: Geneva, IL. | Registered: Oct 25, 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Eric White:
quote:
Originally posted by dr.darkrichandbold:
I'm not sure I understand? I've seen great well balanced wines come out of nearly every region. I can't think of a well respected region that is unable to make wine that is balanced and capable of achieving "physiologic ripeness" (an ambiguous term that is undefinable and a popular buzz word in the wine world BTW...).


I'd love to see someone more knowledgeable chime in here (Stefania, where are you?), but I'm not so sure it is undefinable. I think phenolic maturity is a real and tangible thing that can be measured by such things as sugar levels in the stems, characteristics of the seeds, etc.

Anyhow, I am obviously not MoselleLuxemburg, but what I think he is alluding to is the effects of climate change, not conditions as they are today. What if temperatures rise to the point where grapes are ripening too quickly, before full phenol development takes place. Then you wind up with high sugar levels, but immature flavors. This is why vintners are often hoping for hang time, so the grapes progress slowly enough.


Here's a little article:
http://www.wineanorak.com/alcohollevelsrising.htm

One point mentioned in the article is:
quote:

Conceptually, it helps to distinguish two distinct ripening processes in grapes. I should add that this is perhaps a slightly simplistic dichotomy that is disputed by some, but I think it serves a useful conceptual purpose.

Sugar ripeness: as the grapes mature, the sugar levels rise and the acid levels decrease.
Phenolic or physiological ripeness: changes in tannins, reduction in methoxypyrazine levels, leading to ‘flavour ripeness’.
In cool climates, the physiological ripeness precedes sugar ripeness. Indeed, throughout much of Europe, the only measurement required as harvest time comes round is the level of sugar in the grapes. Once this reaches a certain level, you can assume that the grapes are ripe. And in many regions, the addition of sugar to the must in a process known as chaptalization is carried out because full sugar ripeness hasn’t been achieved. Acid levels are commonly quite high at harvest in cool climates.

In ideal climates the two ripenesses intersect: physiological maturity is reached at a sensible sugar level, where the acidity is also at the appropriate level.

In warm climates, physiological ripeness frequently trails sugar ripeness. Thus winemakers who wait for physiological ripeness often have to contend with high sugar and thus high alcohol levels, and need to acidify, too. Generally speaking, a lack of physiological ripeness is more detrimental to wine quality than a lack of sugar ripeness: it’s much easier to correct for a lack of sugar ripeness than it is to correct for a lack of physiological ripeness. This is because many of the compounds involved in physiological ripeness are antifeedants: the green-tasting methoxypyrazines and bitter tannins are presumably intended to make immature grapes unpalatable to birds. They decrease as the grape matures, to the point where the vine is ready to let the birds to take the grapes to propagate the seeds.

Sugar levels can also increase by desiccation, where the grapes lose water, concentrating both sugar and acidity. This is dubbed ‘saggy grape syndrome’, because of the way that the skins begin to pucker.

In recent years there has been more of an emphasis on achieving flavour/physiological/sugar ripeness through later picking. This is where we encounter the phenomenon known as ‘hang time’. Where harvest occurs in the autumn, picking decisions are often influenced by weather concerns: the grapes are brought in before the autumn rains. In warmer climates with settled harvest weather, the grapes can be left as long as needed: the temptation is to pick late, allowing what is known as ‘hang time’. It is controversial, because changes occur to the tannic structure and the fruit profile, which, in its most extreme incarnation results in wines that show ‘dead fruit’.



That article surely does not claim to be the undisputed truth. Also i understand DRAB is not just talking about natural sugar levels.


Slainte Mhath!
 
Posts: 448 | Location: Luxemburg | Registered: Nov 15, 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
That article surely does not claim to be the undisputed truth. Also i understand DRAB is not just talking about natural sugar levels.


Seemingly a very iformed article. Thanks for sharing it! While there are certainly data points that are meaurable (sugar level, acid, tannins, etc.) What I think becomes difficult is how these are interpreted. What may be physiologically ripe or ripe based on sugar levels to one grower, vineyard manager or winemaker may be different to another.


So much wine.....so little time!!!
 
Posts: 5815 | Location: San Francisco | Registered: Jun 20, 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
I don't think it is as simple as all this

My three favorite producers in Piedmont are:

La Spinetta (as 'New World' as it gets in Piedmont)
Sandrone (right down the middle)
Giacosa (almost as 'Old World' as it gets)

I can appreciate, but I'm not a huge fan of the Old World styled Napa Cabs (Berigner PR, Montelena, etc). But I'm also not ga-ga over the overripe New World stuff, either. My preference is for the Ripe Napa fruit that is yet balanced and not overdone -- Harlan, Araujo, KL and KL Reserves, Etude, etc.

I don't like almost all Australian Shiraz and Cabernet.

I can say, categorically, that I do not like overripe, nor out-of-balance wines. I can say that my preference is for Champagne, Rhones, Burgundies, and Italians. But, whithin the context of what I would define as well-made wines, it is hard for me to pre-judge a wine based upon its style. And, again, I find this especially true in the Piedmont, which is just about my favorite region on earth, where my 3 favorite wineries really represent three incredibly opposing incredibly opposing ideas on this issue.


"What contemptible scoundrel stole the cork from my lunch?" -- W.C. Fields
 
Posts: 4420 | Registered: Dec 05, 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Eric White:
I'd love to see someone more knowledgeable chime in here (Stefania, where are you?), but I'm not so sure it is undefinable. .


The science of measuring the compounds in grapes that produce flavors is definetly behind the field experience, but it's not undefinable. I expect in the next fe