Go 
|
New 
|
Find 
|
Notify 
|
|
Reply 
|
|
Admin 
|
New PM! 
|
Member
|
no,but I tasted a vetical 1995-2005 last week,while the 1995 was really good and elegant,it was ready to go,as was the 1996.If you got em smoke em.
|
| |
|
Member
|
Do a search or check cellartracker. Get a clue, you've been here long enough.
******* Not looking good for next year either.
|
| |
| Posts: 4540 | Location: Chicago | Registered: May 24, 2002 |    |
|
Member
|
quote: Originally posted by grossie: Do a search or check cellartracker. Get a clue, you've been here long enough.
Wow.
|
| |
|
Member
|
That's....harsh....man
______________________________________ I'm throwin' rocks tonight. Mark it, Dude.
|
| |
| Posts: 2436 | Location: San Luis Obispo, CA | Registered: Mar 21, 2007 |    |
|
Member
|
A little harsh, but seriously- I know there's at least one thread on the 91 Mondavi, I contributed to it a couple of times. I bet there are multiple threads on each wine. I'm not searching it for him because he should know better. It's one thing if a newbie pulls this, it's another when you've been around a while.
******* Not looking good for next year either.
|
| |
| Posts: 4540 | Location: Chicago | Registered: May 24, 2002 |    |
|
Member
|
Haven't had the '90/'91, but several forumites had an '87 at an offline two weeks ago and it was humming, and had life left. 95pts from me.
-IB
"Wine only turns into alcohol if you let it sit."---Lindsay Bluth
|
| |
| Posts: 6123 | Location: Naptown | Registered: Nov 24, 2006 |    |
|
 | Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
© Wine Spectator Online 2009
|