Wine Spectator Online    Wine Spectator Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Wine Conversations    October - What are you buying
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Brashley:
quote:
Originally posted by Mimik:
quote:
Originally posted by Brashley:
...at about the same time the wife was busy picking-up:
2004 Agrícola Falset-Marça Montsant Falset Old Vines


She has good taste as the 2000 Falset was one of the best Spanish wines I've ever had.


really? I'm a bit surprised by this ... I had a mere taste of this the other evening and it tasted awfully grapey. There was a nice element of old-world funk as well as wet earth, but it seemed a bit too sweet to me. That being said, it was only a 1 or 2 oz. pour. I've reserved judgment for later this evening, when the bottle can be finished off and the wine has had ample opportunity to open.


I can't speak for the 2004 as I only had the 2000 and the 2003(pass). But I'd give it a couple of years and re-try. This is subtle with lots of terroir and blackberry notes. I just really associated with the wine.


***********************
"I have drunk not to the clouding of my reason, but just so much that I can still surely distinguish the syllables with my tongue." Athenaeus
 
Posts: 2704 | Location: montreal, qc, canada, earth | Registered: Feb 21, 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Mimik:
quote:
Originally posted by Brashley:
quote:
Originally posted by Mimik:
quote:
Originally posted by Brashley:
...at about the same time the wife was busy picking-up:
2004 Agrícola Falset-Marça Montsant Falset Old Vines


mmmm ... thanks for the tip. we do have another bottle ... i'll just forget about it for awhile and come back to it after it has hopefully had time to come into its own.

She has good taste as the 2000 Falset was one of the best Spanish wines I've ever had.


really? I'm a bit surprised by this ... I had a mere taste of this the other evening and it tasted awfully grapey. There was a nice element of old-world funk as well as wet earth, but it seemed a bit too sweet to me. That being said, it was only a 1 or 2 oz. pour. I've reserved judgment for later this evening, when the bottle can be finished off and the wine has had ample opportunity to open.


I can't speak for the 2004 as I only had the 2000 and the 2003(pass). But I'd give it a couple of years and re-try. This is subtle with lots of terroir and blackberry notes. I just really associated with the wine.
 
Posts: 442 | Location: Los Angeles | Registered: Dec 04, 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Dom'n'Vin'sDad:
2006 Ancient Peaks Zin x6


DnVD,

Have you tried this before or did you buy off the strength of the recent WS review? I love Paso wines but have yet to come by this producer.
 
Posts: 442 | Location: Los Angeles | Registered: Dec 04, 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
2005 Joseph Phelps "Innisfree" Cabernet Sauvignon
 
Posts: 3824 | Location: Toronto, Canada | Registered: May 09, 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by wine+art:
quote:
Originally posted by sprnplr:
1945 La Mission Haut Brion


Very nice, I love '45 Bordeaux.

Have you enjoyed this wine before?

Well done!

I actually didn't buy it, it was a reference to another thread here.

I cannot afford that kind of $$$ for a bottle of wine right now.
 
Posts: 1263 | Location: Jersey City | Registered: Feb 22, 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Mimik:
quote:
Originally posted by Brashley:
quote:
Originally posted by Mimik:
quote:
Originally posted by Brashley:
...at about the same time the wife was busy picking-up:
2004 Agrícola Falset-Marça Montsant Falset Old Vines


She has good taste as the 2000 Falset was one of the best Spanish wines I've ever had.


really? I'm a bit surprised by this ... I had a mere taste of this the other evening and it tasted awfully grapey. There was a nice element of old-world funk as well as wet earth, but it seemed a bit too sweet to me. That being said, it was only a 1 or 2 oz. pour. I've reserved judgment for later this evening, when the bottle can be finished off and the wine has had ample opportunity to open.


I can't speak for the 2004 as I only had the 2000 and the 2003(pass). But I'd give it a couple of years and re-try. This is subtle with lots of terroir and blackberry notes. I just really associated with the wine.


Mimik,
I'm glad I reserved judgment 'till last night. It was a way different and better wine last night, on Day 3, than it was on Day 1. My TN is posted here: http://forums.winespectator.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/3146091161/m/640105755
 
Posts: 442 | Location: Los Angeles | Registered: Dec 04, 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
Nothing.
I went a little nuts in September, so I've imposed a moritorium on buying for the rest of the year. Unless Garagiste offers up something extremely irresistable (which they do with annoying regularity), I'm done for '08.

Now off to battle the cellar defenders! Wink


***********
You never see crazy people walking the streets, screaming about atheism, do you?
 
Posts: 3077 | Location: Everett, WA | Registered: Mar 08, 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
You and me, both.

And I do have an asterisk on my buying slowdown for Garagiste.... Bressan. When they offer the Bressan, I will not hesitate.
 
Posts: 2563 | Location: Alexandria, VA, USA | Registered: Oct 29, 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
Big Grin
Nuthin'.
 
Posts: 4115 | Location: Montreal, QC & MI | Registered: Feb 17, 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
BAC at 19.70.


"Wine is sunlight held together by water" - Galileo
 
Posts: 1068 | Location: Boca Raton, FL | Registered: Dec 29, 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by vinole:
BAC at 19.70.


That's a good place to start a core position. Get ready to average down from there. Razz
 
Posts: 100 | Location: London, ON | Registered: Sep 30, 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by vinole:
BAC at 19.70.


I'd let the countrywide problems (the company - not the nation Razz) play out a little first. They have litigation related problems - from consumer fraud to securities fraud (many brought by states or the feds) - in addition to the whole liquidity crunch and their sub prime problems... I'd rather buy at 25 and know that all the bad news is out there, than buy at 19 and find out I missed another 10 bucks in problems.....

That said - I was a long term shareholder of BAC until end of 07 (sold for tax purposes). I generally like their model of cross selling products and am bullish since the deposit limits are being lifted. That said - I merely want to see how the litigation related to countrywide and how the CDO, CMO, etc. mess plays out a little more. 20 years down the road your purchases today will probably be seen as visionary. It could however be a little bloody in the short run. Hope it works,

G
 
Posts: 442 | Location: Nashville, TN | Registered: Feb 17, 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
In perspective, GM looked good to a lot of people at 10.
Now???? Another perspective.
 
Posts: 4115 | Location: Montreal, QC & MI | Registered: Feb 17, 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
12 X 2002 Torres Coronas Tempranillo. A tad tired, but still tasty for $3 a bottle.

12 X 2005 Villa Maria Sauv. Blanc. $7, Smile.


-IB

PSA: Please report gratuitous trolling/flaming immediately (little triangle at bottom right).
 
Posts: 4243 | Location: Naptown | Registered: Nov 24, 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by thirsty man:
quote:
Originally posted by vinole:
BAC at 19.70.


I'd let the countrywide problems (the company - not the nation Razz) play out a little first. They have litigation related problems - from consumer fraud to securities fraud (many brought by states or the feds) - in addition to the whole liquidity crunch and their sub prime problems... I'd rather buy at 25 and know that all the bad news is out there, than buy at 19 and find out I missed another 10 bucks in problems.....G


I guess you missed this. It was always built in to the price they paid for Countrywide. And BTW, BoA's auction rate securities and Merrill's are settled too and was also built into the price.


"Wine is sunlight held together by water" - Galileo
 
Posts: 1068 | Location: Boca Raton, FL | Registered: Dec 29, 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
5 Mark Ryan Dead Horse
3 Mark Ryan Water Witch
2 Mark Ryan Long Haul
 
Posts: 433 | Location: Honolulu, HI, USA | Registered: Jun 03, 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
Couple of my fav. QPR's:

2007 Saint Cosme CDR
2006 Saint Cosme Gigondas


“What is the soup du jour?"...It’s the soup of the day..."Mmmm, that sounds good, I’ll have that” - Lloyd Christmas
 
Posts: 1095 | Location: OC, CA (Currently in London) | Registered: Aug 01, 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by vinole:
quote:
Originally posted by thirsty man:
quote:
Originally posted by vinole:
BAC at 19.70.


I'd let the countrywide problems (the company - not the nation Razz) play out a little first. They have litigation related problems - from consumer fraud to securities fraud (many brought by states or the feds) - in addition to the whole liquidity crunch and their sub prime problems... I'd rather buy at 25 and know that all the bad news is out there, than buy at 19 and find out I missed another 10 bucks in problems.....G


I guess you missed this. It was always built in to the price they paid for Countrywide. And BTW, BoA's auction rate securities and Merrill's are settled too and was also built into the price.


The $8 billion settlement is only with 11 states. The other states are still litigating with them - and the settlement does not preclude the private litigation against countrywide/BoA that has been ongoing for years for the same issues. I think there is also litigation by the Ohio AG and a few others about discriminatory lending practices that could also materially affect the company. Finally, I have not looked at the recent info, but I believe that there are plenty of cases still pending regarding the countrywide takeover that have not been adjudicated. While BoA and Merril did settle some of the ARC/ARS cases - but only for retail customers with certain restrictions. As I understand the settlement, they do not include business/partnerships/LLCs/trusts/etc. that purchased the ARC/ARS and many of those suits are still pending. While a step in the right direction has been made, the whole litigation cloud has not been removed.

G
 
Posts: 442 | Location: Nashville, TN | Registered: Feb 17, 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by thirsty man:
[The $8 billion settlement is only with 11 states. The other states are still litigating with them - and the settlement does not preclude the private litigation against countrywide/BoA that has been ongoing for years for the same issues. I think there is also litigation by the Ohio AG and a few others about discriminatory lending practices that could also materially affect the company. Finally, I have not looked at the recent info, but I believe that there are plenty of cases still pending regarding the countrywide takeover that have not been adjudicated. While BoA and Merril did settle some of the ARC/ARS cases - but only for retail customers with certain restrictions. As I understand the settlement, they do not include business/partnerships/LLCs/trusts/etc. that purchased the ARC/ARS and many of those suits are still pending. While a step in the right direction has been made, the whole litigation cloud has not been removed.

G


Those states include CA, FL, & AZ where the vast majority of the problems are. The only significant distressed market not included is NV. This group takes care of 90%+ of the problem, and the rest is insignificant from a valuation perspective. Oh, and BAC is up today while the market is down over 300.


"Wine is sunlight held together by water" - Galileo
 
Posts: 1068 | Location: Boca Raton, FL | Registered: Dec 29, 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by vinole:
quote:
Originally posted by thirsty man:
[The $8 billion settlement is only with 11 states. The other states are still litigating with them - and the settlement does not preclude the private litigation against countrywide/BoA that has been ongoing for years for the same issues. I think there is also litigation by the Ohio AG and a few others about discriminatory lending practices that could also materially affect the company. Finally, I have not looked at the recent info, but I believe that there are plenty of cases still pending regarding the countrywide takeover that have not been adjudicated. While BoA and Merril did settle some of the ARC/ARS cases - but only for retail customers with certain restrictions. As I understand the settlement, they do not include business/partnerships/LLCs/trusts/etc. that purchased the ARC/ARS and many of those suits are still pending. While a step in the right direction has been made, the whole litigation cloud has not been removed.

G


Those states include CA, FL, & AZ where the vast majority of the problems are. The only significant distressed market not included is NV. This group takes care of 90%+ of the problem, and the rest is insignificant from a valuation perspective. Oh, and BAC is up today while the market is down over 300.



I think 90% of the problem is a little overstated - perhaps 50% or 60%. It also does not address the ongoing litigation by private parties, the discriminatory lending practices suits, the countrywide/BAC merger related cases and the securities fraud suits. Also while BAC is up today, it is not up as much as the other banks - i.e. it is lagging its competitors. JPM - up 6%, Wachovia up 23% (flier - b/c of citi announcement), citi - up 6%, etc.

Don't get me wrong -if I had to guess in 10 years everyone will be jealous that they did not buy BAC at 19. I just prefer not to take any risk on BAC in the next few months while the last of these issues work themselves out. It could be a rough 5 or 6 years. It could be that all of these things fade away (or become non-material).

G
 
Posts: 442 | Location: Nashville, TN | Registered: Feb 17, 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
you mean like scoring the 02 today for $36.66? Razz

quote:
Originally posted by mareff:
quote:
Originally posted by TBird:
(1)1998 Domaine des Baumard Quarts de Chaume

i may go back and wipe out the baumard soon. i think there are 8 left. Eek


You do that and something bad might happen....


-----------------------------
"religion ='s thought disorder" - sigmund freud



 
Posts: 5102 | Location: Park Slope, Brooklyn | Registered: Nov 20, 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by TBird:
you mean like scoring the 02 today for $36.66? Razz

Big Grin

Cool Well done.
 
Posts: 4115 | Location: Montreal, QC & MI | Registered: Feb 17, 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post