Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 
Member
Posted
It of course is never polite to look a gift horse in the mouth but I will anyways.

My wife came home with a present from a company she works with. A bottle of Saladini Pilastri Rosso Piceno DOC Superiore 2002.
 
Posts: 412 | Location: Stockholm, Sweden | Registered: Apr 08, 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
Haven't tasted it. But it is an $8-$10 (U.S.) bottle. Not likely to be a featured wine at a dinner party. But you could always cook with it.
 
Posts: 1616 | Location: CONNECTICUT | Registered: Oct 19, 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
Just because w wine is $8-10 doesn't mean it isn't a nice wine. Since when is the value of something measured only by its price?
 
Posts: 1789 | Location: Kansas City, MO | Registered: Sep 19, 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
i allway's thought if you won't drink it you not cook with it! Smile
 
Posts: 2713 | Registered: Mar 12, 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
Drink it and decide for yourself. Only you can know whether you like it.
 
Posts: 1789 | Location: Kansas City, MO | Registered: Sep 19, 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Just because w wine is $8-10 doesn't mean it isn't a nice wine.


I never said that it wasn't a "nice" wine. Whatever that means. I simply said that it is not likely to be the feature wine at a dinner party. If you know of any $8 Italian Reds that you would feature at a dinner party, let me know.

quote:
i allway's thought if you won't drink it you not cook with it!


Actually, the old adage is: You shouldn't cook with any wine that you couldn't drink. Not wouldn't drink. This comes from the practice of adding salt to wine to prevent the kitchen staff from drinking it. "Cooking wine" has been salted, and as a result, you can't drink it. So the adage developed to warn people not to use traditional cooking wine to cook with, and instead use "table wine". It has very little to do with the quality of the wine. (Of course you wouldn't use corked or tainted wine either.) If it is drinkable, you can cook with it, irrespective of whether it meets you criteria for personal consumption.
 
Posts: 1616 | Location: CONNECTICUT | Registered: Oct 19, 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
jimmy
must be a slow day at the law office!
Big Grin
 
Posts: 2713 | Registered: Mar 12, 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
Not to be argumentative, but I would have no problems featuring a A Mano Primitivo, Terrale Primitivo, or a Morgante Nero D'Avola at a dinner party, though I might hesitate if it were a wine tasting. My friends aren't high society swells, but they like good wine. And like me, they wouldn't recognize a 100 point wine if it walked in and kicked them in the groin.

And you're quite correct about the cooking wine. Most wines I want to drink, I wouldn't pour in a stew, but I wouldn't put anything in a stew that I wouldn't drink.
 
Posts: 1789 | Location: Kansas City, MO | Registered: Sep 19, 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
Of course, now that I've copped a huge attitude, wouldn't it suck if your wine really was bilgewater?
 
Posts: 1789 | Location: Kansas City, MO | Registered: Sep 19, 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
Don't worry Spencer. You've covered yourself.
quote:
Drink it and decide for yourself


That, of course, is always the best action.
 
Posts: 1616 | Location: CONNECTICUT | Registered: Oct 19, 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
 Previous Topic | Next Topic powered by eve community  
 


© Wine Spectator Online 2006