Wine Spectator Online    Wine Spectator Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Dining and Cooking    Health Question
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 
spo
Member
Posted
Just curious.

Question:
Which do you consider to be worse for your health?

Choices:
Sugar (Refined)
Fat (Animal)

 
 
Posts: 5622 | Registered: May 28, 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
Confused They're both part of the four food groups. Confused

Fat,
Salt,
Sugar,
Caffeine.


--------------------
"One may dislike carrots, spinach, beetroot, or the skin on hot milk. But not wine. It is like hating the air that one breathes, since each is equally indispensable."

Marcel Ayme`
 
Posts: 6942 | Location: The Left Coast | Registered: Dec 01, 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
Sugar rots your teeth. Too much gets stored as fat.

Fat makes you sick but doesn't rot your teeth.

I'd go with fat.

I'd rather have either than corn syrup, artificial sweeteners, margarine or shortening.
 
Posts: 801 | Location: NY | Registered: Dec 09, 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
Sugar by a long shot IMO. All of my wife's family in Korea live past 80 and the basic difference in their diet is they don't eat sweets at all. Plenty of fat and alcohol in their diet though...Cool
 
Posts: 2205 | Location: OC, CA (Currently in London) | Registered: Aug 01, 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
Sugar, no contest.
 
Posts: 13482 | Location: Dallas TX. | Registered: Feb 21, 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
But what would the yeast eat without sugar?


Remember to always aim high, that way you won't get any on your shoes.
 
Posts: 2492 | Location: Vermont | Registered: Sep 10, 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Fat,
Salt,
Sugar,
Caffeine.


I was taught that the 4 food groups were:
Junk
Fast
Fried
Take out

I must have been misled.
 
Posts: 2785 | Registered: Jan 11, 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Plenty of fat and alcohol in their diet though...


I would be curious as to what their overall caloric intake was, and would bank on it being lower than the average in the US.

Personally I know that either in excess is problematic, but I do consume both. My main sugar intake is probably in coffee every morning, and is relatively moderate. I just assume that if I keep running and swimming and lifting, and whatever else I can do, that my body will deal with it. I hope like hell that I am right!
 
Posts: 258 | Registered: Mar 20, 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
I'm with the sugar crowd for sure - but it'd be interesting to do the same poll with salt as one of the three choices.

I cook almost every day and I never worry about how much kosher salt I season with, but man, I'm always frickin AMAZED at the sodium content of processed foods.


"Like a midget at a urinal, I was going to have to stay on my toes..."
Lt Frank Drebin
 
Posts: 673 | Location: St Louis, MO | Registered: Feb 27, 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
I took sugar and caffeine out of my diet and lost twelve pounds and have kept it off.
 
Posts: 5223 | Location: minneapolis minnesota usa | Registered: Dec 17, 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
I chose fat, though, really, it is an unfair question, even going with animal fat. Fish fat is good for you. Pork fat is bad for you.

What is worst, from my understanding, are the bad fats. Tropical nut oils, certain land-dwelling animal fats, etc.

My view on this may be skewed however, because as a matter of day-to-day consumption, my diet does not include any refined sugar or high fructose corn syrup whatsoever (nor tropical nut oils) but it does include mammal fat, as well as butter.


"What contemptible scoundrel stole the cork from my lunch?" -- W.C. Fields
 
Posts: 5084 | Registered: Dec 05, 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by winetarelli:
Pork fat is bad for you.



What about all the joy it brings? Nothing that tastes that good could be ever be bad for you.


Remember to always aim high, that way you won't get any on your shoes.
 
Posts: 2492 | Location: Vermont | Registered: Sep 10, 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by wine+art:
Sugar, no contest.


Ditto,

While too much fat can be bad, refined sugar has absolutely no nutritional value.
 
Posts: 2136 | Location: Tampa, FL | Registered: Jan 27, 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
spo
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by winetarelli:
I chose fat, though, really, it is an unfair question, even going with animal fat. Fish fat is good for you. Pork fat is bad for you.

What is worst, from my understanding, are the bad fats. Tropical nut oils, certain land-dwelling animal fats, etc.

My view on this may be skewed however, because as a matter of day-to-day consumption, my diet does not include any refined sugar or high fructose corn syrup whatsoever (nor tropical nut oils) but it does include mammal fat, as well as butter.


The question is fair, and your admitted action seems to be quite telling.
 
Posts: 5622 | Registered: May 28, 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
Surveys are bad for your health.

Sugar and saturated fat may not be particularly healthy, but at least they are natural, unlike that hydrogificated frankenfat.


http://scmwine.info
 
Posts: 6589 | Location: Santa Clara Valley AVA | Registered: Jul 02, 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
  Powered by Eve Community  
 

Wine Spectator Online    Wine Spectator Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Dining and Cooking    Health Question

© Wine Spectator Online 2009