Home

Enroll Now

Browse Our Courses

Free Sample Class

Why Learn About Wine

Resources

Handbook/FAQ

Technical Support

Student Feedback
Career Courses
Give a Gift
Claim your Gift
Wine Spectator Online    Wine Spectator Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Learn Wine    "Fine tannins"
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 
Member
Posted
IMO the statement “fine tannins” is an oxymoron. It’s like saying cruel kindness. I am taking a chance giving my honest opinion in this forum, replete with expert wine drinkers. Nonetheless, how can the sensation of tannins be fine?
 
Posts: 154 | Location: Southern Cal | Registered: May 16, 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Rik
Member
Posted Hide Post
Easy enough.

Tannins can be either green and harsh (from the pips and the rists and by using unrie grapes), or fine and tasty (from the skins).

Think of the fine bitterness of dark chocolate as opposed to the bitterness you'll experience when eating grapes and biting the pips.
 
Posts: 1121 | Location: Boechout, Belgium | Registered: Dec 23, 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
Fine tannins do indeed exist. Its all in the mouthfeel. Tannins can have many qualities: harsh, seemless, angular, and fine are a few.

Ric Formans Cabs are a good example of a fine tannined style.

Mountain fruited wines (like Howell) are usually a good example of a more angular style.
 
Posts: 592 | Registered: Jan 04, 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Rik:
Easy enough.

Tannins can be either green and harsh (from the pips and the rists and by using unrie grapes), or fine and tasty (from the skins).

Think of the fine bitterness of dark chocolate as opposed to the bitterness you'll experience when eating grapes and biting the pips.


Rik, I understand the different tactile sensation between dark chocolate and grapes. However, I am having one tough time sensing “fine tannins” in wine. For example, I have been drinking QPR Bordeauxs recommended by GV. I barely sense the experience of the tannins; same with a QPR California Cab that I had the other day. What does this mean? Are these proofs of “fine” or “ripe tannins?”
 
Posts: 154 | Location: Southern Cal | Registered: May 16, 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
I frequently experience "fine grain" tannins in some Oregon Pinot's that I enjoy-typically along the finish. When associating "fine" with tannins, you would be describing the intensity level of the tannic structure of the wine or stating exactly how tannic it is. Are the tannins smooth and suttle or are they overpowering or huge?

On a side note: I've been thinking about making a shirt for the last few years that reads "I Love Tannins!"

Because I do....
 
Posts: 39 | Location: Oregon | Registered: Mar 05, 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Bosis:
When associating "fine" with tannins, you would be describing the intensity level of the tannic structure of the wine or stating exactly how tannic it is. Are the tannins smooth and suttle or are they overpowering or huge?

On a side note: I've been thinking about making a shirt for the last few years that reads "I Love Tannins!"

Because I do....



Precisely my opinion; that is, tannins are sensed by degree of tactile intensity. So I get it; when someone states "fine tannins" they are actually saying that the degree of tannin sensation on the palate is not as intense. Right?

If so, that leads to my next question. Is "bold" the right terminology to use when one tastes intense tannins in a wine?
 
Posts: 154 | Location: Southern Cal | Registered: May 16, 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
When describing tannins I usually go with soft, firm, or hard tannins. How tannins come out in the wine to me depends on how much acidity and fruit the wine has compared to the astringency of the wine from the structure of the tannins.
 
Posts: 2700 | Location: minneapolis minnesota usa | Registered: Dec 17, 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by mpls wine guy:
When describing tannins I usually go with soft, firm, or hard tannins. How tannins come out in the wine to me depends on how much acidity and fruit the wine has compared to the astringency of the wine from the structure of the tannins.


My god! Roll Eyes You must be one hell of a waiter.
 
Posts: 6632 | Location: Dallas TX. | Registered: Feb 21, 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:

If so, that leads to my next question. Is "bold" the right terminology to use when one tastes intense tannins in a wine?


"Harsh" is a better word than "bold". "Bold" would be understood to be a rich, high alcohol wine. Ripe fruit tends to cover up the tannic impresion, but riper grapes have less harsh tannins.
Tannins are a class of phenolic compounds that vary greatly in molecular size. The size of the molecule affects how it binds with proteins in saliva. Less ripe grapes and grape skins have the more reactive tannins that are responsible for the gritty feel and astringency.
Wine making techniques that maximize extract from the skin are going to result in more tannins going into the wine. Newer techniques like cold soaking extract color from the skins but leave much of the tannin behind.

So, to summerize, you can have a "bold" wine in the old world style, with lots of tannin resulting from high extraction and less ripe grapes, and you can have "bold" wines in the new world style with forward fruit, dark color, and soft tannins.

Now, what bugs me is the description of "sweet" tannins. That, to me, is a way of evading the description "sweet and flabby".
 
Posts: 894 | Registered: Jul 12, 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by pape du neuf:
quote:

If so, that leads to my next question. Is "bold" the right terminology to use when one tastes intense tannins in a wine?


"Harsh" is a better word than "bold". "Bold" would be understood to be a rich, high alcohol wine. Ripe fruit tends to cover up the tannic impresion, but riper grapes have less harsh tannins.
Tannins are a class of phenolic compounds that vary greatly in molecular size. The size of the molecule affects how it binds with proteins in saliva. Less ripe grapes and grape skins have the more reactive tannins that are responsible for the gritty feel and astringency.
Wine making techniques that maximize extract from the skin are going to result in more tannins going into the wine. Newer techniques like cold soaking extract color from the skins but leave much of the tannin behind.

So, to summerize, you can have a "bold" wine in the old world style, with lots of tannin resulting from high extraction and less ripe grapes, and you can have "bold" wines in the new world style with forward fruit, dark color, and soft tannins.

Now, what bugs me is the description of "sweet" tannins. That, to me, is a way of evading the description "sweet and flabby".


Pape du neuf,

This is excellent. More than likely then, I have been experiencing some reds that are sweet and flabby as opposed to a wine with "fine tannins."
 
Posts: 154 | Location: Southern Cal | Registered: May 16, 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
I generally think of it has a harsh.boldness
 
Posts: 3 | Location: UK | Registered: Mar 27, 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
I think there is a great deal of art and a small amount of science in judging tannin quality. In other words, I like to think of tannins in terms of a quality (fine, grainy, even chunky) and then an intensity. Whether this reflects any particular bio-chemical reality is really beside the point for tasting, although it is certainly of interest to the winemaker.

To me, "fine tannins" is a descriptor indicating a particular quality (rather than intensity) of the mouth-feel. I think you can have a wine with fine tannins that are still very intense and have a substantial drying effect in the mouth and, in contrast, a wine in which tannins are fine, but not as aggressive.

In Oregon, I find the Pinots really run the gamut. I think many do have finer tannins, but I have had plenty with grainy tannins, including one that reminded me of the a liquid version of the purple Dino Flinstone's vitamin. Now, that's grainy!


-----
Daniel R Somerfield
CHEHALEM
http://www.chehalemwines.com
(503) 538-4700
 
Posts: 6 | Location: Newberg, Oregon | Registered: Mar 16, 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
Was the flinstone wine from the 03 vintage?
 
Posts: 39 | Location: Oregon | Registered: Mar 05, 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
Sancho - good question. I think part of it is how we define the word "fine" when describing tannins. Fine can have different senses - e.g. finely ground nuts are not better, just different, than coarsely ground nuts. And fine when describing material can mean either that it's good quality, or that it's got a tighter weave and thread count, which is associated with quality but may not be what you want for your specific purpose.

Daniel described it perfectly - if your mouth feels dry after you swallow, that's usually due to tannins. Tannins can be a good thing in your wine, but you don't want them to be obnoxious and green. However, they are one of the things that can make your wines age and improve.

A lot of people confuse acidity with tannin - one way to distinguish, at least for me, is that acidity can be scrubbing but it usually makes your mouth water, whereas after tannins your mouth has to recover, if that makes any sense.

As far as "bold", that doesn't necessarily mean tannin - you can have bold whites, for examples, or even bold rose. For me, "bold" has more to do with overall intensity, not tannic material.

If you want a demonstration of tannin - get some cheap tea bags from the supermarket. Boil some water, pour it into 3 different cups, and steep a few bags in each. In one, take the bags out as soon as you have some color. In the others, leave them until your tea is nice an dark - longer than recommended on the box. Take them out of the second cup and in the third cup, squeeze them against the side of the cup a few times, then take them out. Taste the three teas.

There's pretty much no acid but lots of tannin and it's going to be a little bitter too. A better tea, made properly, will not have the harsh tannins of the second and third.

When you squeeze out those tea bags, you're ensuring that you get all the bitter tannins out. When making wine, you can use the juice that comes from the crushed grapes, called the free-run juice, or you can press the grapes to get all the juice out. In the first instance, you won't get as many harsh tannins. In the second, it's like squeezing your tea bags. There are tannins in the skins, in the pits, and in the stems of the grape bunch. So if someone does whole-cluster fermentation, they get tannin from the woody parts as well as the grape skins. All of those tannins are different too. And then wood has tannins so if they use fresh oak, they get tannins from the wood.

So you get all different kinds of tannins from all different places and sometimes they just taste god-awful and sometimes they all work together nicely. Lately more people have been talking about ripe stems and seeds - that's because those tannins will be "finer" or less harsh in your mouth, than they will from greener stems.
 
Posts: 144 | Location: All | Registered: Dec 09, 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
Actually, no, this was a 2005.

quote:
Originally posted by Bosis:
Was the flinstone wine from the 03 vintage?


-----
Daniel R Somerfield
CHEHALEM
http://www.chehalemwines.com
(503) 538-4700
 
Posts: 6 | Location: Newberg, Oregon | Registered: Mar 16, 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by daniel@chehalem:
I think there is a great deal of art and a small amount of science in judging tannin quality. In other words, I like to think of tannins in terms of a quality (fine, grainy, even chunky) and then an intensity. Whether this reflects any particular bio-chemical reality is really beside the point for tasting, although it is certainly of interest to the winemaker.

To me, "fine tannins" is a descriptor indicating a particular quality (rather than intensity) of the mouth-feel. I think you can have a wine with fine tannins that are still very intense and have a substantial drying effect in the mouth and, in contrast, a wine in which tannins are fine, but not as aggressive.

In Oregon, I find the Pinots really run the gamut. I think many do have finer tannins, but I have had plenty with grainy tannins, including one that reminded me of the a liquid version of the purple Dino Flinstone's vitamin. Now, that's grainy!


Daniel,

Thanks. Hey, can you recommend an Oregon Pinot in the $20 to $40 range (my usual purchasing span) with what you consider fine tannins?
 
Posts: 154 | Location: Southern Cal | Registered: May 16, 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by GregT:
Sancho - good question. I think part of it is how we define the word "fine" when describing tannins. Fine can have different senses - e.g. finely ground nuts are not better, just different, than coarsely ground nuts. And fine when describing material can mean either that it's good quality, or that it's got a tighter weave and thread count, which is associated with quality but may not be what you want for your specific purpose.

Daniel described it perfectly - if your mouth feels dry after you swallow, that's usually due to tannins. Tannins can be a good thing in your wine, but you don't want them to be obnoxious and green. However, they are one of the things that can make your wines age and improve.

A lot of people confuse acidity with tannin - one way to distinguish, at least for me, is that acidity can be scrubbing but it usually makes your mouth water, whereas after tannins your mouth has to recover, if that makes any sense.

As far as "bold", that doesn't necessarily mean tannin - you can have bold whites, for examples, or even bold rose. For me, "bold" has more to do with overall intensity, not tannic material.

If you want a demonstration of tannin - get some cheap tea bags from the supermarket. Boil some water, pour it into 3 different cups, and steep a few bags in each. In one, take the bags out as soon as you have some color. In the others, leave them until your tea is nice an dark - longer than recommended on the box. Take them out of the second cup and in the third cup, squeeze them against the side of the cup a few times, then take them out. Taste the three teas.

There's pretty much no acid but lots of tannin and it's going to be a little bitter too. A better tea, made properly, will not have the harsh tannins of the second and third.

When you squeeze out those tea bags, you're ensuring that you get all the bitter tannins out. When making wine, you can use the juice that comes from the crushed grapes, called the free-run juice, or you can press the grapes to get all the juice out. In the first instance, you won't get as many harsh tannins. In the second, it's like squeezing your tea bags. There are tannins in the skins, in the pits, and in the stems of the grape bunch. So if someone does whole-cluster fermentation, they get tannin from the woody parts as well as the grape skins. All of those tannins are different too. And then wood has tannins so if they use fresh oak, they get tannins from the wood.

So you get all different kinds of tannins from all different places and sometimes they just taste god-awful and sometimes they all work together nicely. Lately more people have been talking about ripe stems and seeds - that's because those tannins will be "finer" or less harsh in your mouth, than they will from greener stems.


GregT, This is very good and good to hear from you man...always helpful.
 
Posts: 154 | Location: Southern Cal | Registered: May 16, 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Sancho Panza:

Daniel,

Thanks. Hey, can you recommend an Oregon Pinot in the $20 to $40 range (my usual purchasing span) with what you consider fine tannins?


Let me give it some thought and check through my tasting notes... funny how the ones with rough and grainy tannins are the ones that stick out in my mind...


-----
Daniel R Somerfield
CHEHALEM
http://www.chehalemwines.com
(503) 538-4700
 
Posts: 6 | Location: Newberg, Oregon | Registered: Mar 16, 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
Can't find anything specific in my notes, but from memory, I would say the 2005 Eyrie Pinot Noir fits that. I remember the tannins being pretty fine and the texture fairly soft, although lean, rather than lush. The 2003 Scott Paul Audrey fits, too, I think, as do a number of Scott's wines. Generally, I believe you get finer tannins from the grape skin and grainier tannins from oak, although that is something of an oversimplification. So, go to a good wine store and ask for a couple of Oregon Pinots with moderate extraction but limited new oak and see what you think.

GregT's suggestion with teabags is a great one. If you ever have the opportunity to go barrel tasting, that can be a great way to see the differences in tannin quality; you can taste the same lot of fruit in a new barrel and old barrel; you can see the effect of a new barrel from forests with more and less tightly grained wood. There are some many things that affect the tannins (extraction, time in oak, forest, bottle age, etc), it is often difficult to tell what is going on in a wine... but that is part of the fun!

quote:
Originally posted by daniel@chehalem:
quote:
Originally posted by Sancho Panza:

Daniel,

Thanks. Hey, can you recommend an Oregon Pinot in the $20 to $40 range (my usual purchasing span) with what you consider fine tannins?


Let me give it some thought and check through my tasting notes... funny how the ones with rough and grainy tannins are the ones that stick out in my mind...


-----
Daniel R Somerfield
CHEHALEM
http://www.chehalemwines.com
(503) 538-4700
 
Posts: 6 | Location: Newberg, Oregon | Registered: Mar 16, 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Rik
Member
Posted Hide Post
What I meant was, tannins are bitter. The can be bitter in a smooth way, like dark chocolat is bitter, or they can be bitter in a mean way like if you bite a grape pip in half.

In any case: the tannins are needed to balance out acidity and sweetness. And the serve the aging potential in the wine.
The softer, worthy tannins will ease down with age, they will discolor at the same time, giving the wine a more brownish aspect.
The green tannins will remain bitter, leaving the wine unbalanced until nothing really drinkable is left.

Saying that there's a European wine style, with more pronounced tannins may be right. But these should be tannins in the "good" sense. That they are very present has nothing to do with the grapes being unripe. It has to do with the youth of the wine. Without them, the wine will not undergo any decent evolution.
 
Posts: 1121 | Location: Boechout, Belgium | Registered: Dec 23, 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
If you want a demonstration of tannin - get some cheap tea bags from the supermarket. Boil some water, pour it into 3 different cups, and steep a few bags in each. In one, take the bags out as soon as you have some color. In the others, leave them until your tea is nice an dark - longer than recommended on the box. Take them out of the second cup and in the third cup, squeeze them against the side of the cup a few times, then take them out. Taste the three teas.


GregT-

Great analogy! I learned much from your post.

Thanks.


"It's easy to grin, when your ship comes in, and you've got the stockmarket beat, but the man worth-while, is the man who can smile, when his shorts are too tight in the seat." -Judge Smails
 
Posts: 275 | Location: Utah | Registered: Jan 15, 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
 Previous Topic | Next Topic powered by eve community