|
Go
![]() |
New
![]() |
Find
![]() |
Notify
![]() |
Tools
![]() |
Reply
![]() |
|
|
Member |
Much better than earlier vintages. Reasonably generous Grenache and Syrah. Much less restrained and with a more manageable acidity. Sweet cherries and raspberries. B+ for $11 for a very good QPR.
|
||
|
|
Member |
This used to be a "go-to" cheapie for me in years past ('98?) but haven't had it in a long time. Based upon many comments on this forum, and the overall strength of '05, I picked up a few and decided to pop one. Overall, not bad, but not particularly impressed, and Parker's 92? Hardly.
Opened a while (which does improve the wine -- decanting improves it further): Nose of roasted meats, smoked meats, bluebrries, purple fruits, cassis, green leafs such as basil and mint. Soft medium-bodied palate without too much acidity (almost flabby). Fuller bodied. Some brown spice, some mint, some dark fruit. Nothing 'Wow'. Moderate finish without reat tannic or acid grip. Certainly a fine wine, but not up to its Spanish competition in the $12 price range (Borsao Tres Picos could kick the ever loving...) Still, pleasant. (Would probably make a phenomenal braised short rib...) 87.5 "What contemptible scoundrel stole the cork from my lunch?" -- W.C. Fields |
|||
|
|
Member |
You are very specific in your rating, winetarelli. |
|||
|
|
Member |
Indeed. Well, I thought 87 would be a bit too harsh. I wnated to indicate that the wine is pleasurable to drink, but it is neither intellectually stimulating nor hedonistic.
"What contemptible scoundrel stole the cork from my lunch?" -- W.C. Fields |
|||
|
|
Member |
I didn't realize the difference between an 87 and an 88 was one of intellectual stimulation or hedonistic pleasure...... |
|||
|
|
Member |
Of course you did. You're thinking about it right now. Stimulating, huh? ___________________________ Cheers! |
|||
|
| Previous Topic | Next Topic | powered by eve community |
| Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
|

