Member
|
M68,
Saw your post yesterday (10/31) but couldn't remember whether I had the '95 or the '96 of this at home. I checked last night and it's the '95 I bought a 6 pak of on release (back when it was reasonably affordable), I'm guessing late '97 or early '98. Had one about two months after purchase (to establish a "baseline" -- that's what I tell myself "I really should try this now so I have a baseline. Yeah!"). My overall impression of that first bottle is that I was disappointed at how one dimensional (is that what people call "monolithic"?) it seemed.
Had a second bottle a couple of years later and WOW! This wine convinced me that bottle aging really works. Actually, I didn't need to be convinced, I just had to experience it. And I experienced it with this wine, IN SPADES. The opposite of one dimensional -- complex, multi-layered, dark red fruit and mild, polished tannins in a delicate, well-choreographed dance. Yum! Very polished and very tasty. 93+ IMHO.
Haven't had one since. And haven't bought anymore of the Oakville, though I really like this, because the price has at least doubled since the '95 came out.
This should be just fine to drink now or hold for another 5 years (don't know whether it will get better, but it definitely has the stuffing to hold its own for near term cellaring). I would be interested in your notes if you opt to have it now, so I can do some planning for my remaining stash of this.
Cheers!
MG
|
| |
| Posts: 110 | Location: Wenatchee, Washington | Registered: Jan 29, 2002 |    |
|