Wine Spectator Online    Wine Spectator Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Tasting Notes    its screaming eagle worth it
Page 1 2 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 
Member
Posted
is screaming eagle really worth it? is it really that good or is the price just due to the limited production??
 
Posts: 5 | Registered: Jul 29, 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
If you buy it from the mailing list, maybe.
If you buy from a store, internet, someone else, definitely NO.

The price from the mailing list is ridiculous, I think it is now $300, and no wine merits that price. But if you are offered 3 bottles, then you sell one and the other two are free for you. I have tasted 97, 98, 01.
 
Posts: 699 | Location: Puerto Rico | Registered: Nov 21, 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
I tasted it once, and it definately worth $300 a bottle
 
Posts: 3576 | Location: Florida | Registered: Jun 10, 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
At prices of $300 per glass? This is just a wine to be had by those that think it is something special, and have the resources to spend excessively! Again, its just fermented grape juice! IMHO, no wine is worth that much money!
 
Posts: 6150 | Location: Germantown, Tennessee | Registered: Oct 25, 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by latour67:
At prices of $300 per glass? This is just a wine to be had by those that think it is something special, and have the resources to spend excessively! Again, its just fermented grape juice! IMHO, no wine is worth that much money!


have you tasted it?
 
Posts: 3576 | Location: Florida | Registered: Jun 10, 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Serge Birbrair:
I tasted it once, and it definately worth $300 a bottle


Ha! I make it, and it's actually worth $1,000 a bottle. The secondary market says so, and I always trust the secondary market to give me my proper due.
 
Posts: 31 | Location: Boston | Registered: Jul 24, 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
I tried the 02' at the taste of Oakville a few month's ago and thought it was wonderful if I were on the list it would be a no brainer.Since I am not on the list thats a different story. So I will just have to dream about the two pours I was lucky enough to try Cool
 
Posts: 663 | Location: Roseville | Registered: Mar 31, 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Satan:
quote:
Originally posted by Serge Birbrair:
I tasted it once, and it definately worth $300 a bottle


The secondary market says so, and I always trust the secondary market to give me my proper due.


The secondary market have run CMGI to $370 a share...I love to be a seller in the secondary market too.
 
Posts: 3576 | Location: Florida | Registered: Jun 10, 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
serge

I do not doubt it is an excellent wine; but SE is only a 13 year old California Cab Eek, which is so persued by the very wealthy and wannabe's, to make themselves feel really special and privileged, which results in an excessively priced wine on the secondary market, bought mostly to have what they percieve as the best wine---while impressing themselves on having the ability to acquire it.

This is much different than the 2000 & 2003 Bordeaux vintages, where the Chateaux & Negociants are playing the marketplace thru the great price fix, expertly managing supply/demand!

Anyway, if I was on the SE mailing list, I would buy it, especially when it was once selling for $50 a bottle! Still, I will not buy SE on the secondary market, paying $$$$$ for fermented grape juice, regardless of score or quality!

And----I have never tasted SE! Frown
 
Posts: 6150 | Location: Germantown, Tennessee | Registered: Oct 25, 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
i think the obvious answer would be:

if you can afford it without crying, it's worth it

me, i would cry spending $300 or more on one bottle - my limit seems to be a little over a hundred with the exception of large format.

and i thought the point of it being a 13 year old cab was right on as well

and finally, no, never tried it and probably never will
 
Posts: 22 | Registered: May 28, 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
IMHO, it is a wine whose quality backs up the hype, in regards to the cost either through mailing list or secondary market, well that is for each individual to decide.

red4life
 
Posts: 1213 | Location: southern california | Registered: Dec 09, 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
Latour,
I tasted this one at the tasting,
$375 for 18 Cali cult wines with a great dinner,
my notes of the dinner are somehwere on this board.

I'd spend $300 on a bottle of it, I won't spend $1000. I'm sure LePin and Petrus are wonderful wines too,
but....at this stage of my life I'd rather persuit quantaty tasting than getting one prized bottle.

If you have a chance to try it -
don't pass on it. That's all.
 
Posts: 3576 | Location: Florida | Registered: Jun 10, 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
Is a Bentley worth $260,000? Is a 400 foot yacht worth $150 million?

Are they worth it? Depends who you are.
 
Posts: 3550 | Location: Palm Beach | Registered: Nov 08, 2001Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
Screaming Eagle is one of the best CA wines made. And, there are plenty of others that are equal in quality, and cheaper in price. Ultimately it's up to you to decide whether you want to pay the price to drink it. It's no different of an experience than drinking Harlan or Shafer Hillside or Maya (to name a few). They are all the best CA has to offer right now. Whether you want to pay up for it, or not, is a matter of what your financial limitations are.


So much wine.....so little time!!!
 
Posts: 5522 | Location: San Francisco | Registered: Jun 20, 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by dr.darkrichandbold:
Whether you want to pay up for it, or not, is a matter of what your financial limitations are.


Not really. It's also psychological limitations. I envy those who don't have them. I know I do....
 
Posts: 3576 | Location: Florida | Registered: Jun 10, 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
I've only had the '01 but, my reaction is that it is among CA's finest Cabs right now. DRAB mentioned Harlan, HSS and Maya; I think Araujo, Pride Reserve, Karl Lawrence Morisoli and Herb Lamb, Herb Lamb Vineyards, and maybe up to a half dozen others are all relatively on par with Screagle, quality-wise. So, even at the $300 mailing list price, value wise, it isn't a great deal. (And the $900+ retail/auction price is outrageously poor value.)

However, I found Screagle to be a singular expression of CA Cab. Having tasted it only once, I'm nearly confident I could pick it out of a blind line-up. So I can understand an incredibly steep price because it is an outstanding wine and if you want that flavor, there simply isn't another option I've run across. So, I guess it really depends how important the Screaming Eagle flavor is to a person. Personally, unless I was on the mailing list, I would need, nearly, a 7 figure income to really start drinking Screagle more than once every other year (if that). But that's just me.

a


"What contemptible scoundrel stole the cork from my lunch?" -- W.C. Fields
 
Posts: 4328 | Registered: Dec 05, 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
Only on the mailing list.


Only death is free, and even that costs you your life
 
Posts: 1633 | Registered: Apr 20, 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
cdr
Member
Posted Hide Post
No.


**********************************************

"Asking government to fix this crisis is like asking the arsonist to put out the fire." -Thomas Sowell
 
Posts: 4508 | Location: Dubai | Registered: Dec 20, 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Not really. It's also psychological limitations. I envy those who don't have them. I know I do....


Not really. If you can afford to drink it, are interested enough in wine, and you don't, I'd say something is wrong!


So much wine.....so little time!!!
 
Posts: 5522 | Location: San Francisco | Registered: Jun 20, 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by dr.darkrichandbold:
quote:
Not really. It's also psychological limitations. I envy those who don't have them. I know I do....


Not really. If you can afford to drink it, are interested enough in wine, and you don't, I'd say something is wrong!


yes, and I even know what it is. I came with $153 in my pocket to this country 26 years ago. My parents NEVER taught me the art of spending money. 5000 years of my ancestors would just turn in their graves if I spend $1000 a bottle.

Calculations that we can live to 85 and have a bottle of Petrus every day without going broke do not help. My mind just can't go over matter.

Spending money on art is easier for me, I can look and enjoy the art day after day, but I can't force myself to spend $1000 on a bottle.
 
Posts: 3576 | Location: Florida | Registered: Jun 10, 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
Then think of a bottle of Petrus as art, it is.

Isn't a 400ft yacht a ship? You could certainly get lost on it.


For the Portheads... www.theportforum.com
 
Posts: 4168 | Location: Middle Earth | Registered: Sep 02, 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by KillerB:
Then think of a bottle of Petrus as art, it is.



That would defeat the purpose, I do not CONSUME the art. Looking at the bottle of Petrus is not the same as looking at
this
or
this
or
this
 
Posts: 3576 | Location: Florida | Registered: Jun 10, 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
Art affects all of the senses. Music is quite obviously art, sculpture is made more interesting by the touch. Wine, along with food, is art that affects the senses of smell and taste, even touch if you consider the feel in the mouth. It can be beautifully constructed and the nuances suggest an artist's work rather than just somebody throwing it together in a recipe.


For the Portheads... www.theportforum.com
 
Posts: 4168 | Location: Middle Earth | Registered: Sep 02, 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
quote:
sculpture is made more interesting by the touch.



so true...SO TRUE
Smile

KillerB,
yes, wine MAY be viewd as art, but...when the bottle is empty,
the art is gone, while other forms of art are there for life.
 
Posts: 3576 | Location: Florida | Registered: Jun 10, 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
If you are so well off financially that a bottle of Petrus every day is no problem, and you love wine, but hate the thought of spending money, you need to see a shrink. You can't bring the money with you. On the other side of terra firma, it ain't going to matter any more!

And, I personally get far more pleasure out of a fantastic bottle of wine, great food, and loved ones to share it with than any piece of art I could hang on my wall and look at every day. But, that's just me....

To each his own. I would emplore you to at least try a Petrus one day. Or a Screaming Eagle. Especially if you want to, and can afford it.

Cheers,

-DRAB


So much wine.....so little time!!!